Arid
DOI10.1007/s11269-024-03834-8
Comparison of Hybrid LSTAR-GARCH Model with Conventional Stochastic and Artificial-Intelligence Models to Estimate Monthly Streamflow
Sharma, Priyanka; Fathian, Farshad; Machiwal, Deepesh; Bhakar, S. R.; Sharma, Survey D.
通讯作者Sharma, P
来源期刊WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT
ISSN0920-4741
EISSN1573-1650
出版年2024
卷号38期号:10页码:3685-3705
英文摘要Streamflow estimation plays an important role in water resources planning and management, and minimizes the impact of floods and droughts. Therefore, this study aims to estimate monthly streamflows in a semi-arid region of India by employing multiple data-driven models, which include standalone time-series models such as Thomas-Fiering (T-F), autoregressive moving average (ARMA), and the logistic smooth threshold autoregressive (LSTAR) models, artificial intelligence (AI) technique such as artificial neural network (ANN), and an advanced novel hybrid model such as LSTAR coupled with generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity (GARCH), i.e., LSTAR-GARCH model. Furthermore, capability of five models including standalone models (T-F, ARMA), a cascade feed-forward back propagation neural network (CFBPNN), LSTAR, and the hybrid LSTAR-GARCH model, was comparatively evaluated in estimating 40-year (June 1975 to May 2015) monthly streamflow of Jakham reservoir located in Rajasthan state of India. The models were calibrated using first 75% of the dataset, and their predictions were evaluated using four performance evaluation criteria: correlation coefficient (R), root mean square error (RMSE), modified Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (MNSE), and modified index of agreement (MIA). The developed models were validated using remaining 25% dataset (120 months), and their performances were compared by plotting hydrographs and scatter plots between the observed and estimated values. The results suggested that the T-F model was satisfactory for generating synthetic monthly streamflow while the ARMA model accurately estimated the streamflows except at extremes. Among the stand-alone models, CFBPNN-4 model outperformed the other three ones with a higher MNSE value of 0.53, and a lower RMSE value of 30.78 million m3. The proposed hybrid LSTAR-GARCH model, which is based on a novel framework, outperformed the standalone ones in terms of R, MNSE, MIA, and RMSE (0.89, 0.78, 0.58, and 25.92 million m3, respectively).
英文关键词Stochastic models Artificial intelligence Thomas-Fiering model LSTAR-GARCH model
类型Article
语种英语
收录类别SCI-E
WOS记录号WOS:001196345500002
WOS关键词NEURAL-NETWORK MODELS ; RIVER ; ANN ; PREDICTION ; INFLOW ; ARIMA ; ARMA
WOS类目Engineering, Civil ; Water Resources
WOS研究方向Engineering ; Water Resources
资源类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://119.78.100.177/qdio/handle/2XILL650/405924
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Sharma, Priyanka,Fathian, Farshad,Machiwal, Deepesh,et al. Comparison of Hybrid LSTAR-GARCH Model with Conventional Stochastic and Artificial-Intelligence Models to Estimate Monthly Streamflow[J],2024,38(10):3685-3705.
APA Sharma, Priyanka,Fathian, Farshad,Machiwal, Deepesh,Bhakar, S. R.,&Sharma, Survey D..(2024).Comparison of Hybrid LSTAR-GARCH Model with Conventional Stochastic and Artificial-Intelligence Models to Estimate Monthly Streamflow.WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT,38(10),3685-3705.
MLA Sharma, Priyanka,et al."Comparison of Hybrid LSTAR-GARCH Model with Conventional Stochastic and Artificial-Intelligence Models to Estimate Monthly Streamflow".WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT 38.10(2024):3685-3705.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Sharma, Priyanka]的文章
[Fathian, Farshad]的文章
[Machiwal, Deepesh]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Sharma, Priyanka]的文章
[Fathian, Farshad]的文章
[Machiwal, Deepesh]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Sharma, Priyanka]的文章
[Fathian, Farshad]的文章
[Machiwal, Deepesh]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。