Knowledge Resource Center for Ecological Environment in Arid Area
DOI | 10.2166/wcc.2024.724 |
Comparative evaluation of four actual evapotranspiration models over different ecosystems and climate zones in China | |
Yuan, Mengjia; Gan, Guojing; Bu, Jingyi; Su, Yanxin; Ma, Hongyu; Liu, Xianghe; Gao, Yanchun | |
通讯作者 | Gao, YC |
来源期刊 | JOURNAL OF WATER AND CLIMATE CHANGE
![]() |
ISSN | 2040-2244 |
EISSN | 2408-9354 |
出版年 | 2024 |
卷号 | 15期号:7页码:3115-3137 |
英文摘要 | To better understand the discrepancies in evapotranspiration (ET) simulations between ET models, we intercompared four models in China: Priestley-Taylor Jet Propulsion Laboratory (PT-JPL), Penman-Montieth-Leuning Version 2 (PML-V2), Sigmoid Generalized Complementary Function (SGCF), Mapping Evapotranspiration at High Resolution with Internalized Calibration (METRIC). Data from 18 flux sites were used to evaluate the model performance at daytime (when incident shortwave radiation is greater than 20 W/m2) scales. To compare more fairly, we took the intersection of the outputs from four models for the analyses in the main text. All models yielded acceptable results, with PML-V2 or SGCF performing best at most sites. The average coefficient of determination and root mean square error among all sites of LE (latent heat of ET) were 0.72 and 51.71 W/m2 for PT-JPL, 0.80 and 46.65 W/m2 for PML-V2, 0.79 and 41.13 W/m2 for SGCF, 0.70 and 51.09 W/m2 for METRIC. PT-JPL and PML-V2 underestimated ET at most sites, whereas SGCF overestimated, potentially due to uncertainties in the vegetation indices and ET constraint parameters. Compared to measurements, PT-JPL underestimated the proportion of transpiration to evapotranspiration (0.81 versus 0.59), while PML-V2 overestimated (0.81 versus 0.90). Furthermore, all models performed best in the semi-arid zone dominated by grassland sites. |
英文关键词 | evapotranspiration METRIC PML-V2 PT-JPL SGCF |
类型 | Article |
语种 | 英语 |
开放获取类型 | gold |
收录类别 | SCI-E |
WOS记录号 | WOS:001229774200001 |
WOS关键词 | ENERGY-BALANCE CLOSURE ; EDDY-COVARIANCE ; COMPLEMENTARY PRINCIPLE ; HEAT-FLUX ; EVAPORATION ; CALIBRATION ; VEGETATION ; SOIL |
WOS类目 | Water Resources |
WOS研究方向 | Water Resources |
资源类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.177/qdio/handle/2XILL650/404757 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Yuan, Mengjia,Gan, Guojing,Bu, Jingyi,et al. Comparative evaluation of four actual evapotranspiration models over different ecosystems and climate zones in China[J],2024,15(7):3115-3137. |
APA | Yuan, Mengjia.,Gan, Guojing.,Bu, Jingyi.,Su, Yanxin.,Ma, Hongyu.,...&Gao, Yanchun.(2024).Comparative evaluation of four actual evapotranspiration models over different ecosystems and climate zones in China.JOURNAL OF WATER AND CLIMATE CHANGE,15(7),3115-3137. |
MLA | Yuan, Mengjia,et al."Comparative evaluation of four actual evapotranspiration models over different ecosystems and climate zones in China".JOURNAL OF WATER AND CLIMATE CHANGE 15.7(2024):3115-3137. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。