干旱区生态环境知识资源中心(Arid): Using the Outcome and Assessment Information Set to Measure Patient Health Status in Research: A Systematic Review

Arid

DOI	10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105044
	Using the Outcome and Assessment Information Set to Measure Patient Health Status in Research: A Systematic Review
	Bin You, Sang; Stawnychy, Michael A.; Cacchione, Pamela Z.; Bowles, Kathryn H.
通讯作者	Bin You, S
来源期刊	JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION
ISSN	1525-8610
EISSN	1538-9375
出版年	2024
卷号	25 期号:8
英文摘要	Objectives: To review, evaluate, and synthesize existing literature on how health status changes were measured using the Outcome and Assessment Information Set (OASIS). Design: Systematic review. Setting and Participants: Studies were included if they examined the health status of adult patients at 2 or more time points using OASIS, which is a comprehensive assessment tool mandated for home health (HH) patients. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, and Scopus. The methodological quality of the included studies was appraised using the National Institutes of Health quality assessment tool. Results: The initial search yielded 1587 citations, resulting in 27 eligible studies published between 2005 and 2022. All included studies were retrospective cohort studies, with overall quality ranging from good to fair. These studies primarily targeted patients with heart failure, with sample sizes between 40 and 6,637,497 and mean ages of 61.2 to 82.4 years. OASIS version C was the most used version, comparing health status at admission and discharge. Patient health status outcomes encompassed functional (n = 24), physiological (n = 6), emotional/behavioral (n = 4), and cognitive (n = 2) outcomes. Various techniques were employed for scale standardization, compositing individual scores, measuring changes, and reporting outcomes. The predominant methods for assessing change included the corrected Likert scale for standardization, composite change scores for change calculation, and continuous outcomes for reporting. Conclusion and Implications: Researchers have used OASIS to assess patient health status changes in functional, physiological, emotional/behavioral, and cognitive outcomes during the HH episode. Variations in OASIS items and assessment methods across studies have been observed. Our findings underscore the need to standardize item application in research, enabling researchers to synthesize evidence effectively and enhance understanding of patient recovery and HH services. For policymakers and health care providers, these insights could inform resource allocation, care planning, and tailored interventions, ultimately improving health care quality and efficiency. (c) 2024 AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine.
英文关键词	Home health care health status nursing informatics outcome and assessment information set systematic review
类型	Review
语种	英语
收录类别	SCI-E
WOS记录号	WOS:001253767600001
WOS关键词	HEART-FAILURE ; HOME-CARE ; OLDER-ADULTS ; REHABILITATION ; PREDICTORS ; VALIDITY ; OSTOMY ; NURSES ; OASIS ; RISK
WOS类目	Geriatrics & Gerontology
WOS研究方向	Geriatrics & Gerontology
资源类型	期刊论文
条目标识符	http://119.78.100.177/qdio/handle/2XILL650/404719
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Bin You, Sang,Stawnychy, Michael A.,Cacchione, Pamela Z.,et al. Using the Outcome and Assessment Information Set to Measure Patient Health Status in Research: A Systematic Review[J],2024,25(8).
APA	Bin You, Sang,Stawnychy, Michael A.,Cacchione, Pamela Z.,&Bowles, Kathryn H..(2024).Using the Outcome and Assessment Information Set to Measure Patient Health Status in Research: A Systematic Review.JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION,25(8).
MLA	Bin You, Sang,et al."Using the Outcome and Assessment Information Set to Measure Patient Health Status in Research: A Systematic Review".JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION 25.8(2024).