Knowledge Resource Center for Ecological Environment in Arid Area
DOI | 10.1016/j.jtv.2022.12.004 |
The Chinese version of the skin tear knowledge assessment instrument (OASES): Cultural adaptation and validation | |
Feng, Liuqun; Hu, Chen; Li, Juyun; Ying, Yuai; Chen, Lanpeng; Wei, Huiyan; Liang, Hongyan; Hu, Hongyang | |
通讯作者 | Hu, HY |
来源期刊 | JOURNAL OF TISSUE VIABILITY
![]() |
ISSN | 0965-206X |
EISSN | 1876-4746 |
出版年 | 2023 |
卷号 | 32期号:1页码:107-113 |
英文摘要 | Background: Skin tear knowledge is an important predictor of the decreased incidence and management of skin tears, and the knowledge level among Chinese nurses is unknown so far. A validated instrument for measuring skin tear knowledge is urgent. Objective: To culturally adapt the skin tear knowledge assessment instrument (OASES) into Chinese and verify its validity and reliability in the Chinese context. Methods: The cultural adaptation process for OASES into Chinese was established on Beaton's translation model. Content validity was determined by the 8-expert group in wound care. A nationwide psychometric validation study was performed on a convenience sample of 3333 nurses from 113 tertiary hospitals, of whom 98 nurses finished the test-retest procedure for reliability analysis. Item validity (item difficulty and discriminating index) and construct validity (known-groups technique) were tested. Results: The content validity index was 0.88-1.00. The item validity was as follows: Item difficulty ranged from 0.16 to 0.86, with an average value of 0.52; the discriminating index varied between 0.05 and 0.61. The known-group technique demonstrated excellent construct validity with a significant difference between predefined groups with theoretically expected higher knowledge scores and theoretically expected lower knowledge scores (P < 0.001). For the test-retest reliability, the Intraclass correction coefficient (ICC) during a 14-day interval for the overall tool was 0.79 (95% CI = 0.71-0.86), and Cohen's kappa value for each item varied from 0.17 to 0.62. Conclusions: The Chinese version of OASES was validated to be suitable for skin tear knowledge assessment with acceptable psychometric properties, through which the knowledge and training priorities of skin tear among Chinese nurses can be quantified. |
英文关键词 | Skin tear Knowledge Reliability Validity Nursing |
类型 | Article |
语种 | 英语 |
收录类别 | SCI-E ; SSCI |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000950429100001 |
WOS关键词 | AGED CARE ; PREVALENCE ; PREVENTION ; MANAGEMENT ; RECOMMENDATIONS ; EXTREMITIES ; GUIDELINES ; RESIDENTS ; VALIDITY ; PROGRAM |
WOS类目 | Dermatology ; Nursing |
WOS研究方向 | Dermatology ; Nursing |
资源类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.177/qdio/handle/2XILL650/397599 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Feng, Liuqun,Hu, Chen,Li, Juyun,et al. The Chinese version of the skin tear knowledge assessment instrument (OASES): Cultural adaptation and validation[J],2023,32(1):107-113. |
APA | Feng, Liuqun.,Hu, Chen.,Li, Juyun.,Ying, Yuai.,Chen, Lanpeng.,...&Hu, Hongyang.(2023).The Chinese version of the skin tear knowledge assessment instrument (OASES): Cultural adaptation and validation.JOURNAL OF TISSUE VIABILITY,32(1),107-113. |
MLA | Feng, Liuqun,et al."The Chinese version of the skin tear knowledge assessment instrument (OASES): Cultural adaptation and validation".JOURNAL OF TISSUE VIABILITY 32.1(2023):107-113. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。