Knowledge Resource Center for Ecological Environment in Arid Area
DOI | 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128920 |
How well do the multi-satellite and atmospheric reanalysis products perform in hydrological modelling | |
Gu, Lei; Yin, Jiabo; Wang, Sheng; Chen, Jie; Qin, Hui; Yan, Xiao; He, Shaokun; Zhao, Tongtiegang | |
通讯作者 | Yin, JB |
来源期刊 | JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY
![]() |
ISSN | 0022-1694 |
EISSN | 1879-2707 |
出版年 | 2023 |
卷号 | 617 |
英文摘要 | Multi-satellite, gauge-based and atmospheric reanalysis precipitation and temperature datasets with increasing spatiotemporal resolution are proliferating in recent decades. Their estimation accuracy has been evaluated in several areas, but their applications in global hydrological monitoring and modelling have been poorly under-stood so far. Here, we focus on the performance of the recently released Multi-Source Weighted-Ensemble Precipitation, version 2 (MSWEP V2) and the atmospheric reanalysis ERA5 temperature in modelling daily river discharge over 10,596 global catchments. Four lumped models including XAJ, GR4J, HMETS, and HBV are employed to take different model conceptual schemes into consideration. Moreover, different streamflow con-ditions including the peak timing and volumes of both high and low flows are evaluated to reveal further dy-namics. The results show that: (a) the MSWEP V2 and ERA5 combination yields satisfactory performance in global streamflow simulation with at least one candidate model exhibiting Kling-Gupta efficiency (KGE) > 0.5 at both calibration and validation periods for each catchment; (b) better simulation skills are achieved in temperate, cold, polar, and tropical Ko center dot ppen-Geiger climate zones, whereas the arid zone has poorer performance; (c) the XAJ, GR4J, and HMETS models with different degree of realisms have their own merits in simulating both daily mean flow and wet flow conditions but perform less satisfactorily in low flow conditions, while the HBV exhibits consistently poor performance in various flow conditions over most catchments. Our findings highlight the importance of selecting appropriate hydrological models by considering both climatic and geophysical condi-tions and targeting streamflow metrics, and suggest the potential of using multi-satellite and atmospheric reanalysis datasets as observed alternatives for quasi-global hydrological modelling. |
英文关键词 | Satellite precipitation Atmospheric reanalysis Hydrological models Runoff simulation Global |
类型 | Article |
语种 | 英语 |
收录类别 | SCI-E |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000906859400001 |
WOS关键词 | GLOBAL WATER-RESOURCES ; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS ; RUNOFF-MODEL ; A SIMPLE ; PART 2 ; PRECIPITATION ; RAINFALL ; GAUGE ; TEMPERATURE ; DATASET |
WOS类目 | Engineering, Civil ; Geosciences, Multidisciplinary ; Water Resources |
WOS研究方向 | Engineering ; Geology ; Water Resources |
资源类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.177/qdio/handle/2XILL650/397386 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Gu, Lei,Yin, Jiabo,Wang, Sheng,et al. How well do the multi-satellite and atmospheric reanalysis products perform in hydrological modelling[J],2023,617. |
APA | Gu, Lei.,Yin, Jiabo.,Wang, Sheng.,Chen, Jie.,Qin, Hui.,...&Zhao, Tongtiegang.(2023).How well do the multi-satellite and atmospheric reanalysis products perform in hydrological modelling.JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY,617. |
MLA | Gu, Lei,et al."How well do the multi-satellite and atmospheric reanalysis products perform in hydrological modelling".JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY 617(2023). |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。