干旱区生态环境知识资源中心(Arid): Review of the approaches for assessing protected areas? effectiveness

Arid

DOI	10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106929
	Review of the approaches for assessing protected areas? effectiveness
	Chen, Haojie; Zhang, Tong; Costanza, Robert; Kubiszewski, Ida
通讯作者	Chen, HJ
来源期刊	ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW
ISSN	0195-9255
EISSN	1873-6432
出版年	2023
卷号	98
英文摘要	Sustainable development requires improvement of both the quantity and quality of protected areas (PAs). This paper reviews the assessments of PAs' effectiveness and provides further guidance of using the assessment approaches, including: (1) evaluation based on a theory of change that describes how and why an intervention is supposed to work; (2) counterfactual evaluation using a random or constructed control group, or baseline of the treatment group as the counterfactual; (3) economic evaluation that assesses benefits and costs of interventions; (4) consultation; (5) case studies; (6) rapid assessments based on readily available evaluation sheets (e.g., scorecards); and (7) approaches focusing on a specific aspect of PAs (e.g., ecological integrity, representativeness, and threats). These approaches have different characteristics and suitability to different assessment purposes and should be selected accordingly. For future research, we anticipate (1) an expanded PA effectiveness assessment guidebook integrating detailed instructions of the approaches and potential indicators, (2) more practical control-group-constructing techniques (3) more sophisticated and reliable techniques for valuing ecosystem services and biodiversity, and (4) further work to clarify the features of different evaluation sheets for rapid assessments. In terms of linkage with global initiatives, this review may help in the preparation of the National Reports (that indicate information on PAs' effectiveness) submitted to the Convention on Biological Diversity and evaluation of actions taken to fulfill PA-related goals of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, Convention to Combat Desertification 2018-2030 Strategic Framework, Paris Agreement, and especially Post2020 Global Biodiversity Framework.
英文关键词	Effectiveness assessment Methodology Policy impact Counterfactual Theory of change Cost -benefit -effectiveness analysis
类型	Review
语种	英语
开放获取类型	Green Submitted
收录类别	SSCI
WOS记录号	WOS:000866399900009
WOS关键词	THREAT REDUCTION ASSESSMENTS ; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES ; BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION ; COST-EFFECTIVENESS ; CAUSAL INFERENCE ; DELPHI METHOD ; MANAGEMENT ; ECONOMICS ; IMPACTS ; TOOL
WOS类目	Environmental Studies
WOS研究方向	Environmental Sciences & Ecology
资源类型	期刊论文
条目标识符	http://119.78.100.177/qdio/handle/2XILL650/396149
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Chen, Haojie,Zhang, Tong,Costanza, Robert,et al. Review of the approaches for assessing protected areas? effectiveness[J],2023,98.
APA	Chen, Haojie,Zhang, Tong,Costanza, Robert,&Kubiszewski, Ida.(2023).Review of the approaches for assessing protected areas? effectiveness.ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW,98.
MLA	Chen, Haojie,et al."Review of the approaches for assessing protected areas? effectiveness".ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW 98(2023).