Arid
DOI10.3174/ajnr.A7790
Validity Assessment of an Automated Brain Morphometry Tool for Patients with De Novo Memory Symptoms
Rahmani, F.; Jindal, S.; Raji, C. A.; Wang, W.; Nazeri, A.; Perez-Carrillo, G. G.; Miller-Thomas, M. M.; Graner, P.; Marechal, B.; Shah, A.; Zimmermann, M.; Chen, C. D.; Keefe, S.; LaMontagne, P.; Benzinger, T. L. S.
通讯作者Benzinger, TLS
来源期刊AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY
ISSN0195-6108
EISSN1936-959X
出版年2023
卷号44期号:3页码:261-267
英文摘要BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Automated volumetric analysis of structural MR imaging allows quantitative assessment of brain atrophy in neurodegenerative disorders. We compared the brain segmentation performance of the AI-Rad Companion brain MR imaging software against an in-house FreeSurfer 7.1.1/Individual Longitudinal Participant pipeline. MATERIALS AND METHODS: T1-weighted images of 45 participants with de novo memory symptoms were selected from the OASIS-4 database and analyzed through the AI-Rad Companion brain MR imaging tool and the FreeSurfer 7.1.1/Individual Longitudinal Participant pipeline. Correlation, agreement, and consistency between the 2 tools were compared among the absolute, normalized, and standardized volumes. Final reports generated by each tool were used to compare the rates of detection of abnormality and the compatibility of radiologic impressions made using each tool, compared with the clinical diagnoses. RESULTS: We observed strong correlation, moderate consistency, and poor agreement between absolute volumes of the main cortical lobes and subcortical structures measured by the AI-Rad Companion brain MR imaging tool compared with FreeSurfer. The strength of the correlations increased after normalizing the measurements to the total intracranial volume. Standardized measurements differed significantly between the 2 tools, likely owing to differences in the normative data sets used to calibrate each tool. When considering the FreeSurfer 7.1.1/Individual Longitudinal Participant pipeline as a reference standard, the AI-Rad Companion brain MR imaging tool had a specificity of 90.6%-100% and a sensitivity of 64.3%-100% in detecting volumetric abnormalities. There was no difference between the rate of compatibility of radiologic and clinical impressions when using the 2 tools. CONCLUSIONS: The AI-Rad Companion brain MR imaging tool reliably detects atrophy in cortical and subcortical regions implicated in the differential diagnosis of dementia.
类型Article
语种英语
开放获取类型Green Published
收录类别SCI-E
WOS记录号WOS:000935465400001
WOS关键词SURFACE-BASED ANALYSIS ; COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT ; ALZHEIMERS-DISEASE ; DIAGNOSIS ; DEMENTIA ; GUIDELINES ; SCALE ; ADNI
WOS类目Clinical Neurology ; Neuroimaging ; Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
WOS研究方向Neurosciences & Neurology ; Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
资源类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://119.78.100.177/qdio/handle/2XILL650/395276
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Rahmani, F.,Jindal, S.,Raji, C. A.,et al. Validity Assessment of an Automated Brain Morphometry Tool for Patients with De Novo Memory Symptoms[J],2023,44(3):261-267.
APA Rahmani, F..,Jindal, S..,Raji, C. A..,Wang, W..,Nazeri, A..,...&Benzinger, T. L. S..(2023).Validity Assessment of an Automated Brain Morphometry Tool for Patients with De Novo Memory Symptoms.AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY,44(3),261-267.
MLA Rahmani, F.,et al."Validity Assessment of an Automated Brain Morphometry Tool for Patients with De Novo Memory Symptoms".AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY 44.3(2023):261-267.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Rahmani, F.]的文章
[Jindal, S.]的文章
[Raji, C. A.]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Rahmani, F.]的文章
[Jindal, S.]的文章
[Raji, C. A.]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Rahmani, F.]的文章
[Jindal, S.]的文章
[Raji, C. A.]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。