Knowledge Resource Center for Ecological Environment in Arid Area
DOI | 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116174 |
Identification of key priority areas under different ecological restoration scenarios on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau | |
Liu, Yixuan; Liu, Shiliang; Wang, Fangfang; Liu, Hua; Li, Mingqi; Sun, Yongxiu; Wang, Qingbo; Yu, Lu | |
通讯作者 | Liu, SL |
来源期刊 | JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
![]() |
ISSN | 0301-4797 |
EISSN | 1095-8630 |
出版年 | 2022 |
卷号 | 323 |
英文摘要 | With the intensification of climate warming and human activities, the ecosystems on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau (QTP) are facing increasing threats which leads to extensive ecological degradation. Ecological restoration measures need to be implemented to improve biodiversity and ecosystem services to mitigate the impact of climate change and human disturbances. However, the key priority areas (KPAs) for ecological restoration are not clear on the QTP, and the benefits of ecosystem services for ecological restoration are often ignored. In this study, we are the first to identify the KPAs based on the quantitative evaluation method and multicriteria optimization algorithm under five restoration scenarios aiming at ecosystem service improvement on the QTP. Results showed that: (1) The benefits of ecological restoration for climate change mitigation and associated costs under different scenarios showed generally similar spatial variability, exhibiting higher in the south and lower in the west, which were different from those for biodiversity. (2) The restoration priorities in Sichuan and Yunnan were generally higher under scenarios II and V, while in Xinjiang, Sichuan, Yunnan, and western and southern Tibet were higher under scenarios I, III and IV. (3) For different ecosystems, the similarities lied in that the restoration priorities of wetland ecosystem were the highest, while those of desert ecosystem were the lowest under five restoration scenarios. (4) When the restoration area requirement was 25% of the total degraded area, the highest restoration priority levels under scenarios I, III and IV were mainly distributed in Guinan, Renbu, Nierong and Chayu counties, and under scenarios II and V were mainly distributed in Renbu, Lang and Guinan counties. When the restoration area requirements were 50% and 75% of the total degraded area, the counties with higher restoration priority levels under scenario II were different from those under other four scenarios. This study identified the KPAs under different restoration scenarios, which provided references for the restoration measures implementation on the QTP. |
英文关键词 | Ecological restoration Biodiversity conservation Climate change mitigation Restoration costs Restoration benefit Key priority areas (KPAs) |
类型 | Article |
语种 | 英语 |
收录类别 | SCI-E |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000858366200001 |
WOS关键词 | LAND-USE ; CLIMATE-CHANGE ; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES ; ALPINE GRASSLANDS ; GRAZING EXCLUSION ; BIODIVERSITY ; OPTIMIZATION ; CONSERVATION ; DESERTIFICATION ; SIMULATION |
WOS类目 | Environmental Sciences |
WOS研究方向 | Environmental Sciences & Ecology |
资源类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.177/qdio/handle/2XILL650/393424 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Liu, Yixuan,Liu, Shiliang,Wang, Fangfang,et al. Identification of key priority areas under different ecological restoration scenarios on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J],2022,323. |
APA | Liu, Yixuan.,Liu, Shiliang.,Wang, Fangfang.,Liu, Hua.,Li, Mingqi.,...&Yu, Lu.(2022).Identification of key priority areas under different ecological restoration scenarios on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau.JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT,323. |
MLA | Liu, Yixuan,et al."Identification of key priority areas under different ecological restoration scenarios on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau".JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 323(2022). |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。