干旱区生态环境知识资源中心(Arid): Straw checkboard or Afforestation?-Assessment and comparison of combined benefits of two typical sand fixing models

Arid

DOI	10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131924
	Straw checkboard or Afforestation?-Assessment and comparison of combined benefits of two typical sand fixing models
	Rong, Yuejing; Yan, Yan; Zhao, Chunli; Wang, Chenxing; Shang, Xu; Zhu, Jieyuan; Li, Kai; Yang, Shanshan; Lu, Huiting; Zheng, Tianchen; Zheng, Lifu
通讯作者	Yan, Y
来源期刊	JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
ISSN	0959-6526
EISSN	1879-1786
出版年	2022
卷号	358
英文摘要	Land desertification and sandstorms have been affecting cities worldwide on the edge of sandstorms, so humans have been seeking for ways to strengthen their defenses against wind and sand. High water retention capacity can improve human well-being in sandy areas. Several measures and cases have been already developed. To systematically find the differences between different ecosystem restoration models according to integrated benefits (e.g., ecological, economic and social benefits), this paper proposes an effective technical methodology to quantitatively identify sand control projects in a certain area. With the Southern edge of Tengger DesertShapotou in China as an example, this paper uses land use change and NDVI change rates to identify areas of wind and sand management. In addition, this paper uses actual evaporation (ET), soil moisture (SM), temperature vegetation dryness index (TVDI) and sand fixation service to compare the advantages and disadvantages of two typical sand management models in China according to their wind and sand control benefits, resource conservation, as well as socio-economic benefits. As indicated by the results, the straw checkboard engineering model has sustainable ecological and socio-economic benefits in water retention, cost consumption, as well as wind and sand control. Besides, the afforestation model achieves higher ecological benefits in the short term, whereas it has higher operating costs and poor sustainability, which makes this model difficult in maintaining ecological stability. On the whole, both types of sand control projects show their advantages and disadvantages in wind and sand control functions, resource recycling and socio-economic benefits. Furthermore, fast-growing afforestation combined with straw checkboards is capable of sustainably resisting wind and sand attacks and preventing land desertification. Accordingly, the finding of this paper can be referenced widely for wind and sand control.
英文关键词	Sand fixation Straw checkboard Growing afforestation Ecological benefits Socio-economic benefits
类型	Article
语种	英语
收录类别	SCI-E
WOS记录号	WOS:000808081600003
WOS关键词	SOIL-MOISTURE ; ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION ; LOESS PLATEAU ; VEGETATION ; DESERT ; EVAPOTRANSPIRATION ; PATTERNS ; IMPACTS ; REGION ; COVER
WOS类目	Green & Sustainable Science & Technology ; Engineering, Environmental ; Environmental Sciences
WOS研究方向	Science & Technology - Other Topics ; Engineering ; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
资源类型	期刊论文
条目标识符	http://119.78.100.177/qdio/handle/2XILL650/393365
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Rong, Yuejing,Yan, Yan,Zhao, Chunli,et al. Straw checkboard or Afforestation?-Assessment and comparison of combined benefits of two typical sand fixing models[J],2022,358.
APA	Rong, Yuejing.,Yan, Yan.,Zhao, Chunli.,Wang, Chenxing.,Shang, Xu.,...&Zheng, Lifu.(2022).Straw checkboard or Afforestation?-Assessment and comparison of combined benefits of two typical sand fixing models.JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION,358.
MLA	Rong, Yuejing,et al."Straw checkboard or Afforestation?-Assessment and comparison of combined benefits of two typical sand fixing models".JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION 358(2022).