干旱区生态环境知识资源中心(Arid): 不同造林方式对宁南山区樟子松抗旱造林效果的影响

Arid

	不同造林方式对宁南山区樟子松抗旱造林效果的影响
其他题名	Effects of Drought Resistant Afforestation of PinusSylvestnisvar.Mongolicain Mountainous Area of Southern Ningxia Under Different Planting Patterns
	王正安; 余治家; 马杰; 佘萍; 贾宝光; 李颖
来源期刊	水土保持通报
ISSN	1000-288X
出版年	2021
卷号	41 期号:5 页码:226-
中文摘要	[目的]定量评价干旱半干旱区生态工程建设和造林初期的效果,为该区域筛选出较为适宜的造林处理技术措施提供实践指导依据。[方法]对该地区造林树种樟子松进行了覆膜+浇水、覆膜+不浇水、不覆膜+浇水、修剪和对照(CK)5种技术的处理对比试验,对造林初期的3个指标成活率、年均生长量及造林成本为衡量指标,应用模糊数学隶属函数值法定量的对其效果进行综合比较与评价。[结果]不同造林处理措施的成活率大小依次为覆膜+浇水(96%)>覆膜+不浇水(95%)>修剪(92.3%)>不覆膜+浇水(91.3%)>对照(CK,89.3%);保存率大小依次为覆膜+浇水(94.6%)>覆膜+不浇水(94%)>不覆膜 +浇水(87.3%)>对照(CK,80%)>修剪(77%);年均生长量大小依次为覆膜+浇水(14.6cm)>覆膜+不浇水(13.5cm)>不覆膜+浇水(11.5cm)>修剪(10.6cm)>对照(CK,9.7cm);造林成本的大小依次为覆膜+浇水(14 037.5元/hm~2)>覆膜+不浇水(11 712.5元/hm~2)>不覆膜+浇水(10 450元/hm~2)>修剪(8 750元/hm~2)>对照(CK,8 125元/hm~2)。[结论]5种造林处理方式的初期效果综合评价差异明显,由强到弱排序为:覆膜+不浇水(0.674 4)>覆膜+浇水(0.666 7)>修剪(0.508 1)>不覆膜+浇水(0.425 6)>对照(CK,0.333 3),因此覆膜+不浇水造林技术措施具备良好的造林成效,对该技术的推广应用具有非常重要的实践和理论意义。
英文摘要	[Objective]The effects of ecological engineering construction and afforestation at the initial stage in arid and semi-arid regions was evaluated quantitatively,in order to provide practical guidance for screening out more suitable afforestation treatment technical measures in this region.[Methods]In a Pinus sylvestnis var.mongolica plantation,five treatments were implemented:film mulching and watering(FW),film mulching but no watering(F),watering but no film mulching(W),pruning(P),and check(CK,no watering,no mulching,no pruning).Three evaluation indicators(survival rate,average annual growth,and afforestation cost at the initial stage)were measured,compared,and evaluated by using the membership function value method in fuzzy mathematics.[Results]Survival rate of the five treatments followed the order of FW(96%)>F(95%)>P(92.3%)>W(91.3%)>CK(89.3%).Preservation rate followed the order of FW(94.6%)>F(94%)>W(87.3%)>CK(80%)>P(77%).Average annual growth followed the order of FW(14.6cm)>F(13.5cm)>W(11.5cm)>P(10.6cm)>CK(9.7cm).Afforestation cost followed the order of FW(14 037.5yuan/hm~2)>F(11 712.5yuan/hm~2)>W(10 450yuan/hm~2)>P(8 750yuan/hm~2)>CK(8 125 yuan/hm~2).[Conclusion]Differences in the initial effect were obvious between the five afforestation treatments according to the comprehensive evaluation,and the overall order was F(0.674 4)>FW(0.666 7)>P(0.508 1)>W(0.425 6)>CK(0.333 3).Therefore,the technology of film mulching and no watering(F)provided the best overall effect and had the greatest potential for promotion and application.
中文关键词	樟子松 ; 覆膜 ; 浇水 ; 抗旱造林技术 ; 隶属函数值法
英文关键词	Pinus sylvestnis var.mongolica film mulching watering drought-resistant afforestation technology subordinate function values
类型	Article
语种	中文
收录类别	CSCD
WOS类目	Forestry
CSCD记录号	CSCD:7086100
资源类型	期刊论文
条目标识符	http://119.78.100.177/qdio/handle/2XILL650/377911
作者单位	王正安, 宁夏农林科学院固原分院, 固原, 宁夏 756000, 中国.; 余治家, 宁夏农林科学院固原分院, 固原, 宁夏 756000, 中国.; 马杰, 宁夏农林科学院固原分院, 固原, 宁夏 756000, 中国.; 佘萍, 宁夏农林科学院固原分院, 固原, 宁夏 756000, 中国.; 贾宝光, 宁夏农林科学院固原分院, 固原, 宁夏 756000, 中国.; 李颖, 宁夏农林科学院固原分院, 固原, 宁夏 756000, 中国.
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	王正安,余治家,马杰,等. 不同造林方式对宁南山区樟子松抗旱造林效果的影响[J],2021,41(5):226-.
APA	王正安,余治家,马杰,佘萍,贾宝光,&李颖.(2021).不同造林方式对宁南山区樟子松抗旱造林效果的影响.水土保持通报,41(5),226-.
MLA	王正安,et al."不同造林方式对宁南山区樟子松抗旱造林效果的影响".水土保持通报 41.5(2021):226-.