Knowledge Resource Center for Ecological Environment in Arid Area
DOI | 10.1016/j.isci.2021.103637 |
Acuity and summation strategies differ in vinegar and desert fruit flies | |
Currea, John P.; Frazer, Rachel; Wasserman, Sara M.; Theobald, Jamie | |
通讯作者 | Wasserman, SM (corresponding author),Wellesley Coll, Dept Neurosci, Wellesley, MA 02481 USA. ; Theobald, J (corresponding author),Florida Int Univ, Dept Biol Sci, Miami, FL 33199 USA. |
来源期刊 | ISCIENCE
![]() |
EISSN | 2589-0042 |
出版年 | 2022 |
卷号 | 25期号:1 |
英文摘要 | An animal's vision depends on terrain features that limit the amount and distribution of available light. Approximately 10,000 years ago, vinegar flies (Drosophila melanogaster) transitioned from a single plant specialist into a cosmopolitan generalist. Much earlier, desert flies (D. mojavensis) colonized the New World, specializing on rotting cactuses in southwest North America. Their desert habitats are characteristically flat, bright, and barren, implying environmental differences in light availability. Here, we demonstrate differences in eye morphology and visual motion perception under three ambient light levels. Reducing ambient light from 35 to 18 cd/m(2) causes sensitivity loss in desert but not vinegar flies. However, at 3 cd/m(2), desert flies sacrifice spatial and temporal acuity more severely than vinegar flies to maintain contrast sensitivity. These visual differences help vinegar flies navigate under variably lit habitats around the world and desert flies brave the harsh desert while accommodating their crepuscular lifestyle. |
类型 | Article |
语种 | 英语 |
开放获取类型 | Green Published, gold |
收录类别 | SCI-E |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000747086300005 |
WOS关键词 | DROSOPHILA-MELANOGASTER ; 1ST-ORDER INTERNEURONS ; INFORMATION CAPACITY ; RETINAL TOPOGRAPHY ; VISUAL-ACUITY ; EYE ; VISION ; LIGHT ; FLIGHT ; PHOTORECEPTORS |
WOS类目 | Multidisciplinary Sciences |
WOS研究方向 | Science & Technology - Other Topics |
资源类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.177/qdio/handle/2XILL650/376525 |
作者单位 | [Currea, John P.] Florida Int Univ, Dept Psychol, Miami, FL 33199 USA; [Frazer, Rachel] Columbia Univ, Div Neurobiol & Behav, New York, NY 10027 USA; [Wasserman, Sara M.] Wellesley Coll, Dept Neurosci, Wellesley, MA 02481 USA; [Theobald, Jamie] Florida Int Univ, Dept Biol Sci, Miami, FL 33199 USA; [Currea, John P.] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Integrat Biol & Physiol, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Currea, John P.,Frazer, Rachel,Wasserman, Sara M.,et al. Acuity and summation strategies differ in vinegar and desert fruit flies[J],2022,25(1). |
APA | Currea, John P.,Frazer, Rachel,Wasserman, Sara M.,&Theobald, Jamie.(2022).Acuity and summation strategies differ in vinegar and desert fruit flies.ISCIENCE,25(1). |
MLA | Currea, John P.,et al."Acuity and summation strategies differ in vinegar and desert fruit flies".ISCIENCE 25.1(2022). |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。