Arid
DOI10.1371/journal.pone.0259805
Comparison of point and roadside transect methods to evaluate the abundance and richness of diurnal raptors in the arid region of Rajasthan
Tiwari, Govind; Pandey, Puneet; Kaul, Rahul; Lee, Hang; Singh, Randeep
通讯作者Singh, R (corresponding author),Amity Univ, Amity Inst Forestry & Wildlife, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India. ; Pandey, P ; Lee, H (corresponding author),Seoul Natl Univ, Conservat Genome Resource Bank Korean Wildlife CG, Res Inst Vet Sci, Seoul, South Korea. ; Pandey, P ; Lee, H (corresponding author),Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Vet Med, Seoul, South Korea.
来源期刊PLOS ONE
ISSN1932-6203
出版年2021
卷号16期号:12
英文摘要Diurnal raptors show a wider distribution compared to other groups of birds including passerines, woodpeckers, and seriemas, but occur at lower-than-expected densities. Estimating the precise abundance is essential to achieve conservation goals but the methods used to estimate the populations of birds need to be appropriate to arrive at meaningful conclusions. We compared the two survey methods: roadside point count and strip transects, for estimating species richness and abundance of raptors in the arid landscape of Rajasthan. Roadside point counts and roadside strip transects were done on 50 transects between December 2019- February 2020 (with an average length of 20 km and a total distance of 3000 km) to assess the species richness and abundance of raptors. A total of 2954 observations of raptors belonging to 35 species were recorded using both methods. Mann Whitney U test result showed no significant difference in species richness and abundance estimates between both methods (p = 0.206). The point count method yielded a higher relative abundance of 2.79 individuals [10 km(2)](-1)h(-1) than the 1.90 individuals [10 km(2)](-1)h(-1) obtained during the strip transect. Also, the number of unidentified species were less for point counts. Extrapolation values indicated that both the methods do not differ much for the detection of unsampled species. The choice of survey method depends on the objectives of the study, but our results favor the use of point counts rather than strip transects to survey raptors in open habitats. The information generated from this study is expected to provide the most efficient method to study the abundance and distribution of raptors in similar landscapes.
类型Article
语种英语
开放获取类型Green Published, gold
收录类别SCI-E
WOS记录号WOS:000754625200005
WOS关键词HABITAT USE ; EXTRAPOLATION ; RAREFACTION ; MIGRATION ; COUNTS ; CENSUS
WOS类目Multidisciplinary Sciences
WOS研究方向Science & Technology - Other Topics
资源类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://119.78.100.177/qdio/handle/2XILL650/375689
作者单位[Tiwari, Govind; Singh, Randeep] Amity Univ, Amity Inst Forestry & Wildlife, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India; [Pandey, Puneet; Lee, Hang] Seoul Natl Univ, Conservat Genome Resource Bank Korean Wildlife CG, Res Inst Vet Sci, Seoul, South Korea; [Pandey, Puneet; Lee, Hang] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Vet Med, Seoul, South Korea; [Kaul, Rahul] Wildlife Trust India, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Tiwari, Govind,Pandey, Puneet,Kaul, Rahul,et al. Comparison of point and roadside transect methods to evaluate the abundance and richness of diurnal raptors in the arid region of Rajasthan[J],2021,16(12).
APA Tiwari, Govind,Pandey, Puneet,Kaul, Rahul,Lee, Hang,&Singh, Randeep.(2021).Comparison of point and roadside transect methods to evaluate the abundance and richness of diurnal raptors in the arid region of Rajasthan.PLOS ONE,16(12).
MLA Tiwari, Govind,et al."Comparison of point and roadside transect methods to evaluate the abundance and richness of diurnal raptors in the arid region of Rajasthan".PLOS ONE 16.12(2021).
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Tiwari, Govind]的文章
[Pandey, Puneet]的文章
[Kaul, Rahul]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Tiwari, Govind]的文章
[Pandey, Puneet]的文章
[Kaul, Rahul]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Tiwari, Govind]的文章
[Pandey, Puneet]的文章
[Kaul, Rahul]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。