Knowledge Resource Center for Ecological Environment in Arid Area
| DOI | 10.1007/s11406-021-00442-3 |
| The Three-Case Argument against the Moral Justificatory Significance of Basic Desert | |
| Mishura, Aleksandr | |
| 通讯作者 | Mishura, A (corresponding author), HSE Univ, Moscow, Russia. |
| 来源期刊 | PHILOSOPHIA
 |
| ISSN | 0048-3893 |
| EISSN | 1574-9274 |
| 出版年 | 2021-11 |
| 英文摘要 | This paper challenges the moral justificatory significance of the notion of basic desert. The notion of basic desert is commonly used in the literature to distinguish a specific sense of moral responsibility that depends on free will. In this sense, a person is morally responsible for an action if this action belongs to her in such a way that she would deserve to be blamed if she understood that it was morally wrong, and she would deserve to be praised if she understood that it was morally exemplary. The central question of the paper concerns the role of the notion of basic desert in moral justifications of social practices including responsibility practices. I argue that the significance sometimes attributed to the notion of basic desert is largely a byproduct of its isolation from a larger context of other moral reasons and moral justifications. First, I introduce the concepts of special and general moral justifications and defend the central assumption behind these concepts. Next, I present a three-case argument that challenges the justificatory moral significance of the notion of basic desert by considering various logical roles that it might play in the general moral justification of various social practices. Finally, I apply this argument to Derk Pereboom's theory of hard incompatibilism in order to show that moral justification of the revisionary part of his project does not depend on the belief in free will necessary for moral responsibility in the sense of basic desert. |
| 英文关键词 | Basic desert Moral justification Free will Compatibilism Incompatibilism |
| 类型 | Article ; Early Access |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| 收录类别 | AHCI |
| WOS记录号 | WOS:000721404300001 |
| WOS关键词 | FREE WILL DEBATE |
| WOS类目 | Philosophy |
| WOS研究方向 | Philosophy |
| 资源类型 | 期刊论文 |
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.177/qdio/handle/2XILL650/367732 |
| 作者单位 | [Mishura, Aleksandr] HSE Univ, Moscow, Russia |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Mishura, Aleksandr. The Three-Case Argument against the Moral Justificatory Significance of Basic Desert[J],2021. |
| APA | Mishura, Aleksandr.(2021).The Three-Case Argument against the Moral Justificatory Significance of Basic Desert.PHILOSOPHIA. |
| MLA | Mishura, Aleksandr."The Three-Case Argument against the Moral Justificatory Significance of Basic Desert".PHILOSOPHIA (2021). |
| 条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 | |||||
| 个性服务 |
| 推荐该条目 |
| 保存到收藏夹 |
| 导出为Endnote文件 |
| 谷歌学术 |
| 谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
| [Mishura, Aleksandr]的文章 |
| 百度学术 |
| 百度学术中相似的文章 |
| [Mishura, Aleksandr]的文章 |
| 必应学术 |
| 必应学术中相似的文章 |
| [Mishura, Aleksandr]的文章 |
| 相关权益政策 |
| 暂无数据 |
| 收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
