干旱区生态环境知识资源中心(Arid): 长期咸水滴灌对灰漠土理化性质及棉花生长的影响

Arid

	长期咸水滴灌对灰漠土理化性质及棉花生长的影响
其他题名	Effects of long-term saline water drip irrigation on physicochemical properties and cotton growth in grey desert soil
	周永学; 李美琪; 黄志杰; 侯振安; 闵伟
来源期刊	干旱地区农业研究
ISSN	1000-7601
出版年	2021
卷号	39 期号:4 页码:1000-7601
中文摘要	为揭示长期咸水滴灌对灰漠土物理化学特性及棉花生长的影响,研究了咸水灌溉11 a后土壤盐分、容重、水力特性、棉花耐盐生理特征及产量。试验设置3个灌溉水盐度水平: 0.35 dS·m~(-1)(淡水) 、4.61 dS·m~(-1)(微咸水)和8.04 dS·m~(-1)(咸水) 。研究表明:与淡水灌溉相比,微咸水和咸水灌溉显著增加土壤容重、盐分、pH值和土壤含水量,显著降低土壤孔隙度、全氮和有机质含量;土壤饱和导水率在微咸水和咸水灌溉处理下分别较淡水处理降低45%和60%,体积含水率随着灌溉水盐度的增加而增大;与淡水灌溉相比,微咸水和咸水灌溉显著降低棉花叶面积、叶水势、气孔导度、叶绿素含量和干鲜质量比,其中叶水势分别较淡水处理下降43.34%和63.46%;微咸水和咸水灌溉显著增加棉花叶片相对电导率和丙二醛含量,同时SOD、POD和CAT活性也显著增加,脯氨酸含量分别较淡水灌溉增加69.52%和212%;棉花总生物量在微咸水和咸水灌溉处理下分别较淡水灌溉处理降低14.15%和32.88%;籽棉产量分别较淡水灌溉降低12.6%和25.7%。综上所述,长期的微咸水和咸水灌溉显著增加土壤盐分含量、降低土壤养分含量,土壤水分的可利用性也显著下降,导致棉花生物量和产量降低。
英文摘要	To reveal the effect of long-term saline water irrigation on physicochemical properties of grey desert soil,cotton growth and yield in Xinjiang,a 11-year field experiment for evaluating long-term saline water irrigation effects on soil salinity,bulk density,hydraulic characteristics,physiological characteristics of salt tolerance and seed cotton yield was conducted. The experimental design was three irrigation water salinity treatments of 0.35 dS· m-1,4.61 dS·m~(-1),and 8.04 dS·m~(-1),representing fresh water,brackish water,and saline water,respectively. The results showed that irrigation with brackish water and saline water significantly increased soil bulk density,salinity, pH and soil water content,but significantly reduced soil porosity,TN and SOM. Soil saturated hydraulic conductivity was significantly lower by 45% and 60% in the brackish water and saline water treatments than that in the fresh water treatment,and the volumetric water content also increased when irrigation water salinity increased. The brackish water and saline water irrigation significantly reduced leaf area,leaf water potential,stomatal conductance, chlorophyll content,and ratio of dry-and-wet mass when compared to fresh water irrigation. In addition,the leaf water potential was significantly lower by 43.34% and 63.46% in the brackish water and saline water treatments than that in the fresh water treatment,respectively. The brackish water and saline water irrigation significantly increased the relative electrical conductivity ( REC) ,MDA content of cotton leaves as well as the activities of SOD, POD and CAT. Proline content was significantly increased with increasing salinity of irrigation water,when compared to the fresh water irrigation treatment,proline content under brackish water treatment was increased by 69.52%,and proline content under saline water treatment was increased by 212%,respectively. In general,the fresh water irrigation also produced the highest biomass and seed cotton yield. The biomass reduction caused by using the brackish water was 14.15% and by using saline water was 32.88% lower than those of using the fresh water. Seed cotton yield were 12.60% and 25.72% lower under brackish and saline water irrigation treatment than that under fresh water irrigation treatment,respectively. In summary,long-term brackish water and saline water irrigation significantly increased soil salinity,resulting in a decrease in soil nutrients and a significant decrease in availability of soil water,and ultimately reduced cotton biomass and yield.
中文关键词	长期咸水滴灌 ; 灰漠土 ; 理化性质 ; 抗氧化酶活性 ; 产量 ; 棉花
英文关键词	long-term saline water drip irrigation grey desert soil physicochemical properties antioxidant enzyme activity yield cotton
类型	Article
语种	中文
国家	中国
收录类别	CSCD
WOS类目	Agriculture
CSCD记录号	CSCD:7023242
资源类型	期刊论文
条目标识符	http://119.78.100.177/qdio/handle/2XILL650/365014
作者单位	周永学, 石河子大学农学院, 石河子, 新疆 832003, 中国.; 李美琪, 石河子大学农学院, 石河子, 新疆 832003, 中国.; 黄志杰, 石河子大学农学院, 石河子, 新疆 832003, 中国.; 侯振安, 石河子大学农学院, 石河子, 新疆 832003, 中国.; 闵伟, 石河子大学农学院, 石河子, 新疆 832003, 中国.
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	周永学,李美琪,黄志杰,等. 长期咸水滴灌对灰漠土理化性质及棉花生长的影响[J],2021,39(4):1000-7601.
APA	周永学,李美琪,黄志杰,侯振安,&闵伟.(2021).长期咸水滴灌对灰漠土理化性质及棉花生长的影响.干旱地区农业研究,39(4),1000-7601.
MLA	周永学,et al."长期咸水滴灌对灰漠土理化性质及棉花生长的影响".干旱地区农业研究 39.4(2021):1000-7601.