干旱区生态环境知识资源中心(Arid): General Versus Special Theories of Discrimination

Arid

DOI	10.1163/17455243-20203273
	General Versus Special Theories of Discrimination
	Segev, Re'em
通讯作者	Segev, R (corresponding author), Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Fac Law, Jerusalem, Israel.
来源期刊	JOURNAL OF MORAL PHILOSOPHY
ISSN	1740-4681
EISSN	1745-5243
出版年	2021
卷号	18 期号:3 页码:265-298
英文摘要	In this paper, I consider two arguments in favor of normative accounts of discrimination that are general - namely, consider all of the moral reasons and hold that the content of these reasons is in no way unique to discrimination - and against special accounts ones that highlight only some of the pertinent factors, while focusing on those that are special to discrimination in some way. The dilemma argument holds that special accounts are unhelpful if they do not entail conclusions regarding the overall moral status of discrimination and implausible if they do. The parsimony argument holds that special accounts are plausible only to the degree to which they are derived from general ones.
英文关键词	discrimination desert priority reasons wellbeing
类型	Article
语种	英语
收录类别	SSCI ; AHCI
WOS记录号	WOS:000668212800003
WOS类目	Ethics ; Philosophy
WOS研究方向	Social Sciences - Other Topics ; Philosophy
来源机构	Hebrew University of Jerusalem
资源类型	期刊论文
条目标识符	http://119.78.100.177/qdio/handle/2XILL650/363969
作者单位	[Segev, Re'em] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Fac Law, Jerusalem, Israel
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Segev, Re'em. General Versus Special Theories of Discrimination[J]. Hebrew University of Jerusalem,2021,18(3):265-298.
APA	Segev, Re'em.(2021).General Versus Special Theories of Discrimination.JOURNAL OF MORAL PHILOSOPHY,18(3),265-298.
MLA	Segev, Re'em."General Versus Special Theories of Discrimination".JOURNAL OF MORAL PHILOSOPHY 18.3(2021):265-298.

条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。

个性服务

谷歌学术

百度学术

必应学术

相关权益政策

收藏/分享