中文版 | English
Arid
DOI10.1007/s11098-015-0479-0
Revisionism, libertarianism, and naturalistic plausibility
Robinson, Michael
通讯作者Robinson, M (corresponding author), Washington & Jefferson Coll, Washington, PA 15301 USA.
来源期刊PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES
ISSN0031-8116
EISSN1573-0883
出版年2015
卷号172期号:10页码:2651-2658
英文摘要In his book, Building Better Beings, Manuel Vargas argues that we should reject libertarianism, on the grounds that it is naturalistically implausible, and embrace revisionism rather than eliminativism, on the grounds that the former is a shorter departure from ordinary thinking about moral responsibility. I argue that Vargas fails to adequately appreciate the extent to which ordinary judgments about moral responsibility involve ascriptions of basic desert as well as the centrality of basic desert in the ordinary conception of moral responsibility. Insofar as this is correct, we have good reason to think, first, that libertarianism is much more naturalistically plausible than Vargas maintains and, second, that we ought to opt for eliminativism over revisionism in the event that libertarianism turns out to be implausible.
英文关键词Revisionism Libertarianism Naturalism Desert Manuel Vargas
类型Article
语种英语
收录类别AHCI
WOS记录号WOS:000360809900011
WOS类目Philosophy
WOS研究方向Philosophy
资源类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://119.78.100.177/qdio/handle/2XILL650/361428
作者单位Washington & Jefferson Coll, Washington, PA 15301 USA
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714		 Robinson, Michael. Revisionism, libertarianism, and naturalistic plausibility[J],2015,172(10):2651-2658.
APA Robinson, Michael.(2015).Revisionism, libertarianism, and naturalistic plausibility.PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES,172(10),2651-2658.
MLA Robinson, Michael."Revisionism, libertarianism, and naturalistic plausibility".PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES 172.10(2015):2651-2658.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Robinson, Michael]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Robinson, Michael]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Robinson, Michael]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。