干旱区生态环境知识资源中心(Arid): Retributivism revisited

Arid

DOI	10.1007/s11098-013-0103-0
	Retributivism revisited
	Hanna, Nathan
通讯作者	Hanna, N (corresponding author), Drexel Univ, Dept English & Philosophy, 5044 MacAlister Hall,3141 Chestnut St, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA.
来源期刊	PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES
ISSN	0031-8116
EISSN	1573-0883
出版年	2014
卷号	167 期号:2 页码:473-484
英文摘要	I'll raise a problem for Retributivism, the view that legal punishment is justified on the basis of desert. I'll focus primarily on Mitchell Berman's recent defense of the view. He gives one of the most sophisticated and careful statements of it. And his argument is representative, so the problem I'll raise for it will apply to other versions of Retributivism. His insights about justification also help to make the problem particularly obvious. I'll also show how the problem extends to non-retributive justifications of punishment. I'll argue that Berman's argument makes a questionable assumption about the standard of justification that justifications of punishment must meet to be successful. If we think about what it takes to justify punishment and reflect on the intuitions that retributivists appeal to, it turns out that the intuitions aren't obviously up to the task.
英文关键词	Punishment Justification Retributivism
类型	Article
语种	英语
收录类别	AHCI
WOS记录号	WOS:000329460300018
WOS类目	Philosophy
WOS研究方向	Philosophy
资源类型	期刊论文
条目标识符	http://119.78.100.177/qdio/handle/2XILL650/361335
作者单位	Drexel Univ, Dept English & Philosophy, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Hanna, Nathan. Retributivism revisited[J],2014,167(2):473-484.
APA	Hanna, Nathan.(2014).Retributivism revisited.PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES,167(2),473-484.
MLA	Hanna, Nathan."Retributivism revisited".PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES 167.2(2014):473-484.

条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。

个性服务

谷歌学术

百度学术

必应学术

相关权益政策

收藏/分享