干旱区生态环境知识资源中心(Arid): Priority and Desert

Arid

DOI	10.1007/s10677-013-9420-9
	Priority and Desert
	Rendall, Matthew
通讯作者	Rendall, M (corresponding author), Univ Nottingham, Sch Polit & Int Relat, Univ Pk, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England.
来源期刊	ETHICAL THEORY AND MORAL PRACTICE
ISSN	1386-2820
EISSN	1572-8447
出版年	2013
卷号	16 期号:5 页码:939-951
英文摘要	Michael Otsuka, Alex Voorhoeve and Marc Fleurbaey have challenged the priority view in favour of a theory based on competing claims. The present paper shows how their argument can be used to recast the priority view. All desert claims in distributive justice are comparative. The stronger a party's claims to a given benefit, the greater is the value of her receiving it. Ceteris paribus, the worse-off have stronger claims on welfare, and benefits to them matter more. This can account for intuitions that at first appear egalitarian, as the analysis of an example of Larry Temkin's shows. The priority view, properly understood, is desert-adjusted utilitarianism under the assumption that no other claims pertain.
英文关键词	Priority view Egalitarianism Desert-adjusted utilitarianism Risk
类型	Article
语种	英语
收录类别	AHCI
WOS记录号	WOS:000325693300003
WOS关键词	PRIORITARIANISM ; EGALITARIANISM ; SEPARATENESS ; EQUALITY ; WORSE ; VIEW
WOS类目	Philosophy
WOS研究方向	Philosophy
资源类型	期刊论文
条目标识符	http://119.78.100.177/qdio/handle/2XILL650/361110
作者单位	Univ Nottingham, Sch Polit & Int Relat, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Rendall, Matthew. Priority and Desert[J],2013,16(5):939-951.
APA	Rendall, Matthew.(2013).Priority and Desert.ETHICAL THEORY AND MORAL PRACTICE,16(5),939-951.
MLA	Rendall, Matthew."Priority and Desert".ETHICAL THEORY AND MORAL PRACTICE 16.5(2013):939-951.

条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。

个性服务

保存到收藏夹

导出为Endnote文件

谷歌学术

谷歌学术中相似的文章

[Rendall, Matthew]的文章

百度学术

百度学术中相似的文章

[Rendall, Matthew]的文章

必应学术

必应学术中相似的文章

[Rendall, Matthew]的文章

相关权益政策

暂无数据

收藏/分享