干旱区生态环境知识资源中心(Arid): Smilansky, Arneson, and the asymmetry of desert

Arid

DOI	10.1007/s11098-011-9780-8
	Smilansky, Arneson, and the asymmetry of desert
	Moriarty, Jeffrey
通讯作者	Moriarty, J (corresponding author), Bentley Univ, Dept Philosophy, 175 Forest St,AAC 109, Waltham, MA 02452 USA.
来源期刊	PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES
ISSN	0031-8116
出版年	2013
卷号	162 期号:3 页码:537-545
英文摘要	Desert plays an important role in most contemporary theories of retributive justice, but an unimportant role in most contemporary theories of distributive justice. Saul Smilansky has recently put forward a defense of this asymmetry. In this study, I argue that it fails. Then, drawing on an argument of Richard Arneson's, I suggest an alternative consequentialist rationale for the asymmetry. But while this shows that desert cannot be expected to play the same role in distributive justice that it can play in retributive justice, it does not fully vindicate the asymmetry, since desert can still play an important role in the former.
英文关键词	Asymmetry Desert Distributive justice Retributive justice
类型	Article
语种	英语
收录类别	AHCI
WOS记录号	WOS:000313361100003
WOS关键词	RETRIBUTIVE JUSTICE ; MARKET
WOS类目	Philosophy
WOS研究方向	Philosophy
资源类型	期刊论文
条目标识符	http://119.78.100.177/qdio/handle/2XILL650/361097
作者单位	Bentley Univ, Dept Philosophy, Waltham, MA 02452 USA
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Moriarty, Jeffrey. Smilansky, Arneson, and the asymmetry of desert[J],2013,162(3):537-545.
APA	Moriarty, Jeffrey.(2013).Smilansky, Arneson, and the asymmetry of desert.PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES,162(3),537-545.
MLA	Moriarty, Jeffrey."Smilansky, Arneson, and the asymmetry of desert".PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES 162.3(2013):537-545.

条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。

个性服务

保存到收藏夹

导出为Endnote文件

谷歌学术

谷歌学术中相似的文章

[Moriarty, Jeffrey]的文章

百度学术

百度学术中相似的文章

[Moriarty, Jeffrey]的文章

必应学术

必应学术中相似的文章

[Moriarty, Jeffrey]的文章

相关权益政策

暂无数据

收藏/分享