干旱区生态环境知识资源中心(Arid): Hard incompatibilism and its rivals

Arid

DOI	10.1007/s11098-009-9371-0
	Hard incompatibilism and its rivals
	Pereboom, Derk
通讯作者	Pereboom, D (corresponding author), Cornell Univ, Dept Philosophy, 218 Goldwin Smith Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA.
来源期刊	PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES
ISSN	0031-8116
EISSN	1573-0883
出版年	2009
卷号	144 期号:1 页码:21-33
英文摘要	In this article I develop several responses to my co-authors of Four Views on Free Will. In reply to Manuel Vargas, I suggest a way to clarify his claim that our concepts of free will and moral responsibility should be revised, and I question whether he really proposes to revise the notion of basic desert at stake in the debate. In response to Robert Kane, I examine the role the rejection of Frankfurt-style arguments has in his position, and whether his criticism of my version of this argument is sound. In reply to John Fischer, I argue that the reasons-responsiveness central to his account of moral responsibility is not best characterized counterfactually, and I provide a suggestion for revision.
英文关键词	Free will Moral responsibility Frankfurt-style case Reasons-responsiveness
类型	Article ; Proceedings Paper
语种	英语
收录类别	AHCI
WOS记录号	WOS:000265538700004
WOS关键词	DETERMINISM ; FOLK
WOS类目	Philosophy
WOS研究方向	Philosophy
资源类型	期刊论文
条目标识符	http://119.78.100.177/qdio/handle/2XILL650/360712
作者单位	Cornell Univ, Dept Philosophy, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Pereboom, Derk. Hard incompatibilism and its rivals[J],2009,144(1):21-33.
APA	Pereboom, Derk.(2009).Hard incompatibilism and its rivals.PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES,144(1),21-33.
MLA	Pereboom, Derk."Hard incompatibilism and its rivals".PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES 144.1(2009):21-33.

条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。

个性服务

谷歌学术

百度学术

必应学术

相关权益政策

收藏/分享