干旱区生态环境知识资源中心(Arid): Catch me if you can: personality drives technique-specific biases during live-capture trapping

Arid

DOI	10.1071/WR20121
	Catch me if you can: personality drives technique-specific biases during live-capture trapping
	Johnstone, Kyla Chloe; McArthur, Clare; Banks, Peter Bruce
通讯作者	Johnstone, KC (corresponding author), Univ Sydney, Sch Life & Environm Sci, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. ; Johnstone, KC (corresponding author), Manaaki Whenua Landcare Res, POB 69040, Lincoln 7640, New Zealand.
来源期刊	WILDLIFE RESEARCH
ISSN	1035-3712
EISSN	1448-5494
出版年	2021-06
英文摘要	Context. Wildlife surveys often rely on a single live-capture technique to sample animal populations. Yet, animal personality (e.g. bold vs shy) can drive heterogeneity in capture probability, leading to biased sampling during live-capture trapping surveys. Aims. We tested whether a personality-related capture bias is similar between two live-capture techniques, or whether techniques with different capture mechanisms are biased towards certain spectrums of personality. Methods. We compared two live-capture techniques commonly used for surveying lizards, namely, noosing and pitfall traps. Techniques were deployed several days apart to survey populations of a desert-dwelling agamid, the military dragon, and we used outdoor open-field arenas to test for personality traits relating to boldness, activity and exploration. Key results. We found that noosing and pitfall traps sampled distinctly different spectrums of personality, with no individuals being captured by both techniques. Unexpectedly, noosing, which involved people approaching dragons to capture them, was biased towards shyer individuals that stayed close to shelter. In contrast, pitfall traps, which were generally set in open areas, were biased towards capturing individuals that moved further from shelter. Conclusions. We demonstrated that different live-capture techniques can be biased towards different spectrums of personality. We attribute the relationship between personality and technique to an interaction between the capture mechanisms of each technique and individual perceptions of risk and microhabitat use.
英文关键词	applied ecology behaviour ethology mark-recapture wildlife management
类型	Article ; Early Access
语种	英语
开放获取类型	hybrid
收录类别	SCI-E
WOS记录号	WOS:000667753400001
WOS关键词	SMALL GROUND VERTEBRATES ; ARID SOUTH-AUSTRALIA ; OPEN-FIELD TEST ; ANIMAL PERSONALITY ; FLUCTUATING POPULATIONS ; SAMPLING BIAS ; HABITAT USE ; PITFALL ; REPTILES ; FISH
WOS类目	Ecology ; Zoology
WOS研究方向	Environmental Sciences & Ecology ; Zoology
资源类型	期刊论文
条目标识符	http://119.78.100.177/qdio/handle/2XILL650/352494
作者单位	[Johnstone, Kyla Chloe; McArthur, Clare; Banks, Peter Bruce] Univ Sydney, Sch Life & Environm Sci, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia; [Johnstone, Kyla Chloe] Manaaki Whenua Landcare Res, POB 69040, Lincoln 7640, New Zealand
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Johnstone, Kyla Chloe,McArthur, Clare,Banks, Peter Bruce. Catch me if you can: personality drives technique-specific biases during live-capture trapping[J],2021.
APA	Johnstone, Kyla Chloe,McArthur, Clare,&Banks, Peter Bruce.(2021).Catch me if you can: personality drives technique-specific biases during live-capture trapping.WILDLIFE RESEARCH.
MLA	Johnstone, Kyla Chloe,et al."Catch me if you can: personality drives technique-specific biases during live-capture trapping".WILDLIFE RESEARCH (2021).