Knowledge Resource Center for Ecological Environment in Arid Area
| DOI | 10.1016/j.envsci.2021.05.015 |
| Matching institutionalized expertise with global needs: Boundary organizations and hybrid management at the science-policy interfaces of soil and land governance | |
| De Dona, Matteo | |
| 通讯作者 | De Dona, M (corresponding author), Univ Gothenburg, Sch Global Studies, Box 700, S-40530 Gothenburg, Sweden. |
| 来源期刊 | ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY
 |
| ISSN | 1462-9011 |
| EISSN | 1873-6416 |
| 出版年 | 2021 |
| 卷号 | 123页码:82-90 |
| 英文摘要 | In environmental governance, the role of expertise is regarded as a crucial support to decision-making. Yet, in intergovernmental settings, studies aimed at understanding the relation between science and policy have predominantly focused on the fields of climate change and biodiversity. Through a fieldwork-based study of the Science-Policy Interface (SPI) of the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD) and the Intergovernmental Technical Panel on Soils (ITPS) of the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), this paper investigates the role of scientific expertise in the global governance of soil and land degradation. Drawing upon the concepts of boundary organization and hybrid management, the study shows that analytical tools deriving from the Science and Technology Studies (STS) tradition provide valuable understandings of science-policy dynamics at the intergovernmental level. The results of the analysis reveal that science-policy organizations match the definition of boundary organization to different degrees and that hybrid management strategies occur with different magnitudes, with significant implications for each organization's capacity to bridge science and policy. This implies that such STS concepts should not be regarded as purely descriptive labels, but as resources that can serve broad analytical purposes in the study of global environmental governance. In this respect, the study contributes to an on-going theoretical dialogue between STS and International Relations (IR), claiming that IR scholars should consider the adoption of relevant STS theoretical tools for the analysis of global environmental institutions. |
| 英文关键词 | Science-policy interface Global environmental governance STS Boundary organization Hybrid management UNCCD FAO |
| 类型 | Article |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| 开放获取类型 | hybrid |
| 收录类别 | SCI-E |
| WOS记录号 | WOS:000659872700009 |
| WOS关键词 | TECHNOLOGY ; POWER ; WORK |
| WOS类目 | Environmental Sciences |
| WOS研究方向 | Environmental Sciences & Ecology |
| 资源类型 | 期刊论文 |
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.177/qdio/handle/2XILL650/350157 |
| 作者单位 | [De Dona, Matteo] Univ Gothenburg, Sch Global Studies, Box 700, S-40530 Gothenburg, Sweden |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | De Dona, Matteo. Matching institutionalized expertise with global needs: Boundary organizations and hybrid management at the science-policy interfaces of soil and land governance[J],2021,123:82-90. |
| APA | De Dona, Matteo.(2021).Matching institutionalized expertise with global needs: Boundary organizations and hybrid management at the science-policy interfaces of soil and land governance.ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY,123,82-90. |
| MLA | De Dona, Matteo."Matching institutionalized expertise with global needs: Boundary organizations and hybrid management at the science-policy interfaces of soil and land governance".ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY 123(2021):82-90. |
| 条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 | |||||
| 个性服务 |
| 推荐该条目 |
| 保存到收藏夹 |
| 导出为Endnote文件 |
| 谷歌学术 |
| 谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
| [De Dona, Matteo]的文章 |
| 百度学术 |
| 百度学术中相似的文章 |
| [De Dona, Matteo]的文章 |
| 必应学术 |
| 必应学术中相似的文章 |
| [De Dona, Matteo]的文章 |
| 相关权益政策 |
| 暂无数据 |
| 收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
