干旱区生态环境知识资源中心(Arid): Environmental Assessment of Furrow vs. Drip Irrigated Pear (Pyrus bretschneideri Rehd.) Production Systems in Loess Plateau (China)

Arid

DOI	10.3390/agronomy11061201
	Environmental Assessment of Furrow vs. Drip Irrigated Pear (Pyrus bretschneideri Rehd.) Production Systems in Loess Plateau (China)
	Wang, Jie; Zhao, Mingxin; Wan, Yu; Zeng, Yu; Wei, Yong; Zhang, Yueqiang; Chen, Xinping; Shi, Xiaojun
通讯作者	Shi, XJ (corresponding author), Southwest Univ, Acad Agr Sci, Coll Resources & Environm, Chongqing 400716, Peoples R China. ; Shi, XJ (corresponding author), Southwest Univ, Interdisciplinary Res Ctr Agr Green Dev Yangtze R, Chongqing 400716, Peoples R China. ; Shi, XJ (corresponding author), Minist Educ, Monitoring Stn Soil Qual & Ecol Purple Soil TGR A, Chongqing 400716, Peoples R China. ; Shi, XJ (corresponding author), Southwest Univ, State Cultivat Base Ecoagr Southwest Mountainous, Chongqing 400716, Peoples R China.
来源期刊	AGRONOMY-BASEL
EISSN	2073-4395
出版年	2021
卷号	11 期号:6
英文摘要	Irrigation systems increase fruit yield of water shortage orchards in semiarid and arid lands, but their environmental impacts remain unclear. This study carries out a comparative cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment (LCA) of the furrow and drip irrigated pear production systems in the Loess Plateau of China based on 2009-2018 inventory data from integrated experimental stations. The water depletion (WD), water footprint (WF), global warming (GWP), acidification (AP), and eutrophication (EP) potentials of the furrow and drip irrigated pear production systems were calculated and compared, including the orchard installation phase (phase I), primary growing phase (phase II), low production phase (phase III), and full production phase (phase IV). Results indicated that the cumulative WD, GWP, AP, and EP of the drip irrigated system were 148.3 m(3), 130.1 kg CO2-eq, 0.9 kg SO2-eq, and 0.6 kg PO4-eq per ton of pear fruit harvest, respectively, which were 37.3-73.5% lower than those of the furrow irrigated system. The GWP, AP, EP, and WD of phase I to III contributed 39.3-46.1% in the drip irrigated system vs. 27.8-38.6% in the furrow irrigated system of the total amount, which should not be neglected in perennial orchard systems. The annual WFs were 0.9, 0.2, and 0.2 m(3) kg(-1) year(-1) in phases II, III, and IV of the drip system, respectively, which were 50-71.4% lower than that of the furrow system. Green WF of furrow and drip irrigated systems were approximately the same, but the blue WF and grey WF of drip irrigation systems were 35.7-62.1% and 66.0-73.2% lower than those of the furrow irrigated system. The drip irrigated pear production system significantly mitigated environmental impacts and WFs, mainly due to reduced fertilizer application, water consumption, electricity, and diesel demand. Irrigation that changed from a furrow to a drip system was responsible for most environmental reductions, but 8% decreases of yields in phase IV. The outcomes from assessing the furrow and drip irrigated pear production systems could provide useful information for decision-making by the pear orchardists in the Loess Plateau.
英文关键词	pear environmental impacts assessment water footprint furrow irrigated system drip irrigated system
类型	Article
语种	英语
开放获取类型	gold
收录类别	SCI-E
WOS记录号	WOS:000665462200001
WOS关键词	LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT ; WATER-USE EFFICIENCY ; CARBON FOOTPRINT ; VEGETABLE PRODUCTION ; OXIDE EMISSIONS ; NITROUS-OXIDE ; FOOD SECURITY ; L. ; FERTIGATION ; MANAGEMENT
WOS类目	Agronomy ; Plant Sciences
WOS研究方向	Agriculture ; Plant Sciences
资源类型	期刊论文
条目标识符	http://119.78.100.177/qdio/handle/2XILL650/349413
作者单位	[Wang, Jie; Zeng, Yu; Wei, Yong; Zhang, Yueqiang; Chen, Xinping; Shi, Xiaojun] Southwest Univ, Acad Agr Sci, Coll Resources & Environm, Chongqing 400716, Peoples R China; [Wang, Jie; Zhang, Yueqiang; Chen, Xinping; Shi, Xiaojun] Southwest Univ, Interdisciplinary Res Ctr Agr Green Dev Yangtze R, Chongqing 400716, Peoples R China; [Wang, Jie; Zhang, Yueqiang; Chen, Xinping; Shi, Xiaojun] Minist Educ, Monitoring Stn Soil Qual & Ecol Purple Soil TGR A, Chongqing 400716, Peoples R China; [Wang, Jie; Zhang, Yueqiang; Chen, Xinping; Shi, Xiaojun] Southwest Univ, State Cultivat Base Ecoagr Southwest Mountainous, Chongqing 400716, Peoples R China; [Zhao, Mingxin] Gansu Agr Univ, Coll Hort, Lanzhou 730070, Peoples R China; [Wan, Yu] Chongqing Jiaotong Univ, Sch River & Ocean Engn, Chongqing 400074, Peoples R China
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Wang, Jie,Zhao, Mingxin,Wan, Yu,et al. Environmental Assessment of Furrow vs. Drip Irrigated Pear (Pyrus bretschneideri Rehd.) Production Systems in Loess Plateau (China)[J],2021,11(6).
APA	Wang, Jie.,Zhao, Mingxin.,Wan, Yu.,Zeng, Yu.,Wei, Yong.,...&Shi, Xiaojun.(2021).Environmental Assessment of Furrow vs. Drip Irrigated Pear (Pyrus bretschneideri Rehd.) Production Systems in Loess Plateau (China).AGRONOMY-BASEL,11(6).
MLA	Wang, Jie,et al."Environmental Assessment of Furrow vs. Drip Irrigated Pear (Pyrus bretschneideri Rehd.) Production Systems in Loess Plateau (China)".AGRONOMY-BASEL 11.6(2021).