干旱区生态环境知识资源中心(Arid): Evaluating three evapotranspiration estimates from model of different complexity over China using the ILAMB benchmarking system

Arid

DOI	10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125553
	Evaluating three evapotranspiration estimates from model of different complexity over China using the ILAMB benchmarking system
	Wu, Genan; Cai, Xitian; Keenan, Trevor F.; Li, Shenggong; Luo, Xiangzhong; Fisher, Joshua B.; Cao, Ruochen; Li, Fa; Purdy, Adam J.; Zhao, Wei; Sun, Xiaomin; Hu, Zhongmin
通讯作者	Li, SG (corresponding author), Chinese Acad Sci, Synth Res Ctr, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Key Lab Ecosyst Network Observat & Modeling,Chin, Beijing, Peoples R China. ; Hu, ZM (corresponding author), South China Normal Univ, Sch Geog, Guangzhou, Peoples R China.
来源期刊	JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY
ISSN	0022-1694
EISSN	1879-2707
出版年	2020
卷号	590
英文摘要	Land surface models range in complexity of terrestrial evapotranspiration, yet it is unknown how model complexity translates to accuracy of modeled evapotranspiration estimates. Here, we use the International Land Model Benchmarking system to assess ET estimates from three models of varying complexity driven by the same forcing datasets: an earth system model, a terrestrial biosphere model, and a stand-alone ET model. The performance assessment includes both temporal and spatial evaluation, and different plant functional types across China. Our results indicate that the most complex model, an earth system model, performed best against the benchmarking datasets and metrics. Terrestrial biosphere model performed best in simulating inter-annual variability of ET, while earth system model performed best in simulating the seasonal cycle. The more complex models (earth system model and terrestrial biosphere model) perform better in forest, shrub and crop ecosystems, while the simpler model (stand-alone ET model) perform better in grass ecosystems. Our study demonstrates the impact of model complexity on ET estimates and highlights directions for future ET model improvements.
英文关键词	Benchmarking Evapotranspiration model Model complexity
类型	Article
语种	英语
收录类别	SCI-E
WOS记录号	WOS:000599754500244
WOS关键词	STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE ; ARID REGION ; TERRESTRIAL EVAPOTRANSPIRATION ; USE EFFICIENCY ; CO2 EXCHANGE ; PERFORMANCE ; EVAPORATION ; PHOTOSYNTHESIS ; TEMPERATURE ; ECOSYSTEMS
WOS类目	Engineering, Civil ; Geosciences, Multidisciplinary ; Water Resources
WOS研究方向	Engineering ; Geology ; Water Resources
来源机构	中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所 ; University of California, Berkeley
资源类型	期刊论文
条目标识符	http://119.78.100.177/qdio/handle/2XILL650/349003
作者单位	[Wu, Genan; Li, Shenggong; Zhao, Wei; Sun, Xiaomin] Chinese Acad Sci, Synth Res Ctr, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Key Lab Ecosyst Network Observat & Modeling,Chin, Beijing, Peoples R China; [Wu, Genan; Li, Shenggong; Sun, Xiaomin] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Coll Resources & Environm, Beijing, Peoples R China; [Wu, Genan; Cai, Xitian; Keenan, Trevor F.; Luo, Xiangzhong; Li, Fa] Lawrence Berkeley Natl Lab, Berkeley, CA USA; [Wu, Genan; Keenan, Trevor F.; Luo, Xiangzhong] Univ Calif Berkeley, Berkeley, CA USA; [Fisher, Joshua B.; Purdy, Adam J.] CALTECH, Jet Prop Lab, Pasadena, CA USA; [Cao, Ruochen; Zhao, Wei; Hu, Zhongmin] South China Normal Univ, Sch Geog, Guangzhou, Peoples R China; [Li, Fa] Wuhan Univ, State Key Lab Informat Engn Surveying Mapping & R, Wuhan, Peoples R China; [Hu, Zhongmin] Southern Marine Sci & Engn Guangdong Lab, Zhuhai, Peoples R China
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Wu, Genan,Cai, Xitian,Keenan, Trevor F.,et al. Evaluating three evapotranspiration estimates from model of different complexity over China using the ILAMB benchmarking system[J]. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所, University of California, Berkeley,2020,590.
APA	Wu, Genan.,Cai, Xitian.,Keenan, Trevor F..,Li, Shenggong.,Luo, Xiangzhong.,...&Hu, Zhongmin.(2020).Evaluating three evapotranspiration estimates from model of different complexity over China using the ILAMB benchmarking system.JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY,590.
MLA	Wu, Genan,et al."Evaluating three evapotranspiration estimates from model of different complexity over China using the ILAMB benchmarking system".JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY 590(2020).