Knowledge Resource Center for Ecological Environment in Arid Area
| DOI | 10.1525/nclr.2017.20.3.465 |
| RETRIBUTIVISM AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE | |
| Galoob, Stephen R. | |
| 通讯作者 | Galoob, SR |
| 来源期刊 | NEW CRIMINAL LAW REVIEW
 |
| ISSN | 1933-4192 |
| EISSN | 1933-4206 |
| 出版年 | 2017 |
| 卷号 | 20期号:3页码:465-505 |
| 英文摘要 | Retributivist theories of punishment are in tension with due process. Some retributivists adopt a simple view that punishment of the deserving is normatively justified. However, this Simple Retributivism licenses unjust and illegitimate rules of criminal procedure. A more refined version of retributivism, on which a person's punishment is justified only if she deserves to be punished for the offense with which she is charged and her desert bases cause her to be liable to punishment, avoids the troubling implications of Simple Retributivism. Refined Retributivism also entails specific principles for implementing criminal law-that is, a distinctively Retributivist Criminal Procedure. On this Retributivist Criminal Procedure, procedural mechanisms must establish that there are good reasons to believe that an offender deserves to be punished for an offense, and these reasons must cause the offender's liability to punishment. Yet Refined Retributivism is also difficult to reconcile with due process. Although Retributivist Criminal Procedure has some salutary implications, it also calls for abolishing core aspects of the U.S. system of criminal justice and features that are essential to any legitimate criminal justice system. Thus, retributivism (whether Simple or Refined) does not provide the basis for a just criminal procedure. |
| 英文关键词 | retributivism criminal procedure punishment due process |
| 类型 | Article |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| 收录类别 | ESCI |
| WOS记录号 | WOS:000429460700004 |
| WOS关键词 | LAW ; PUNISHMENT ; DEFENSE ; RESPONSIBILITY ; SENSITIVITY ; DEFENDANTS ; CHARACTER ; ACCURACY ; JUSTICE ; TRIAL |
| WOS类目 | Law |
| WOS研究方向 | Government & Law |
| 资源类型 | 期刊论文 |
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.177/qdio/handle/2XILL650/332570 |
| 作者单位 | [Galoob, Stephen R.] Univ Tulsa, Coll Law, Law, Tulsa, OK 74104 USA |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Galoob, Stephen R.. RETRIBUTIVISM AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE[J],2017,20(3):465-505. |
| APA | Galoob, Stephen R..(2017).RETRIBUTIVISM AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE.NEW CRIMINAL LAW REVIEW,20(3),465-505. |
| MLA | Galoob, Stephen R.."RETRIBUTIVISM AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE".NEW CRIMINAL LAW REVIEW 20.3(2017):465-505. |
| 条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 | |||||
| 个性服务 |
| 推荐该条目 |
| 保存到收藏夹 |
| 导出为Endnote文件 |
| 谷歌学术 |
| 谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
| [Galoob, Stephen R.]的文章 |
| 百度学术 |
| 百度学术中相似的文章 |
| [Galoob, Stephen R.]的文章 |
| 必应学术 |
| 必应学术中相似的文章 |
| [Galoob, Stephen R.]的文章 |
| 相关权益政策 |
| 暂无数据 |
| 收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
