干旱区生态环境知识资源中心(Arid): What are the effects of nature conservation on human well-being? A systematic map of empirical evidence from developing countries

Arid

DOI	10.1186/s13750-016-0058-7
	What are the effects of nature conservation on human well-being? A systematic map of empirical evidence from developing countries
	McKinnon, Madeleine C.; Cheng, Samantha H.; Dupre, Samuel; Edmond, Janet; Garside, Ruth; Glew, Louise; Holland, Margaret B.; Levine, Eliot; Masuda, Yuta J.; Miller, Daniel C.; Oliveira, Isabella; Revenaz, Justine; Roe, Dilys; Shamer, Sierra; Wilkie, David; Wongbusarakum, Supin; Woodhouse, Emily
通讯作者	McKinnon, MC
来源期刊	ENVIRONMENTAL EVIDENCE
ISSN	2047-2382
出版年	2016
卷号	5 期号:1
英文摘要	Background: Global policy initiatives and international conservation organizations have sought to emphasize and strengthen the link between the conservation of natural ecosystems and human development. While many indices have been developed to measure various social outcomes to conservation interventions, the quantity and strength of evidence to support the effects, both positive and negative, of conservation on different dimensions of human wellbeing, remain unclear, dispersed and inconsistent. Methods: We searched 11 academic citation databases, two search engines and 30 organisational websites for relevant articles using search terms tested with a library of 20 relevant articles. Key informants were contacted with requests for articles and possible sources of evidence. Articles were screened for relevance against predefined inclusion criteria at title, abstract and full text levels according to a published protocol. Included articles were coded using a questionnaire. A critical appraisal of eight systematic reviews was conducted to assess the reliability of methods and confidence in study findings. A visual matrix of the occurrence and extent of existing evidence was also produced. Results: A total of 1043 articles were included in the systematic map database. Included articles measured effects across eight nature conservation-related intervention and ten human well-being related outcome categories. Linkages between interventions and outcomes with high occurrence of evidence include resource management interventions, such as fisheries and forestry, and economic and material outcomes. Over 25 % of included articles examined linkages between protected areas and aspects of economic well-being. Fewer than 2% of articles evaluated human health outcomes. Robust study designs were limited with less than 9 % of articles using quantitative approaches to evaluate causal effects of interventions. Over 700 articles occurred in forest biomes with less than 50 articles in deserts or mangroves, combined. Conclusions: The evidence base is growing on conservation-human well-being linkages, but biases in the extent and robustness of articles on key linkages persist. Priorities for systematic review, include linkages between marine resource management and economic/material well-being outcomes; and protected areas and governance outcomes. Greater and more robust evidence is needed for many established interventions to better understand synergies and trade-offs between interventions, in particular those that are emerging or contested.
英文关键词	Biodiversity conservation Natural resource management Human welfare Poverty Human development Sustainability
类型	Article
语种	英语
开放获取类型	DOAJ Gold, Green Published
收录类别	ESCI
WOS记录号	WOS:000449407300008
WOS类目	Environmental Sciences
WOS研究方向	Environmental Sciences & Ecology
Scopus学科分类	Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Natl Ctr Ecol Anal & Synth, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA.
来源机构	University of London ; University of California, Los Angeles
资源类型	期刊论文
条目标识符	http://119.78.100.177/qdio/handle/2XILL650/332028
作者单位	[McKinnon, Madeleine C.; Edmond, Janet] Conservat Int, Arlington, VA 22202 USA; [McKinnon, Madeleine C.] Univ Queensland, Sch Biol Sci, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia; [Cheng, Samantha H.] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Natl Ctr Ecol Anal & Synth, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA; [Cheng, Samantha H.] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Los Angeles, CA USA; [Dupre, Samuel; Holland, Margaret B.; Shamer, Sierra] Univ Maryland Baltimore Cty, Baltimore, MD 21228 USA; [Garside, Ruth] Univ Exeter, European Ctr Environm & Human Hlth, Med Sch, Truro, England; [Glew, Louise] World Wildlife Fund, 1250 24th St,NW, Washington, DC 20037 USA; [Levine, Eliot] Mercy Corps, Portland, OR USA; [Masuda, Yuta J.] Nature Conservancy, Boston, MA USA; [Miller, Daniel C.] Univ Illinois, Champaign, IL USA; [Oliveira, Isabella] Univ Queensland, St Lucia, Qld, Australia; [Roe, Dilys] Int Inst Environm & Dev, London, England; [Wilkie, David] Wildlife Conservat Soc, New York, NY USA; [Wongbusarakum, Supin] Univ Hawaii, Joint I...
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	McKinnon, Madeleine C.,Cheng, Samantha H.,Dupre, Samuel,et al. What are the effects of nature conservation on human well-being? A systematic map of empirical evidence from developing countries[J]. University of London, University of California, Los Angeles,2016,5(1).
APA	McKinnon, Madeleine C..,Cheng, Samantha H..,Dupre, Samuel.,Edmond, Janet.,Garside, Ruth.,...&Woodhouse, Emily.(2016).What are the effects of nature conservation on human well-being? A systematic map of empirical evidence from developing countries.ENVIRONMENTAL EVIDENCE,5(1).
MLA	McKinnon, Madeleine C.,et al."What are the effects of nature conservation on human well-being? A systematic map of empirical evidence from developing countries".ENVIRONMENTAL EVIDENCE 5.1(2016).