干旱区生态环境知识资源中心(Arid): Offending the One Percent: Seven Arguments Against Distributive Desert

Arid

DOI	10.1080/07393148.2016.1153188
	Offending the One Percent: Seven Arguments Against Distributive Desert
	Malleson, Tom
通讯作者	Malleson, T
来源期刊	NEW POLITICAL SCIENCE
ISSN	0739-3148
EISSN	1469-9931
出版年	2016
卷号	38 期号:2 页码:178-200
英文摘要	The belief that people morally deserve the income they acquire in the market is both powerful and deep-rooted. Nevertheless, most political philosophers are skeptical of the idea that market income is morally deserved. There is thus a large and uncomfortable chasm between the philosophical mainstream and the actual public. The purpose of this article was to inject new intellectual effort in closing this gap. The goal is the ambitious one of a comprehensive demolition of the notion of distributive desert. To this end, I put forward seven critical arguments. Four of them are common in the literature. Since these have been adequately discussed elsewhere, I mention them here briefly and only for completeness. The core of the article focuses on three original arguments. Overall, my aim is to show that, taking these arguments together, the case against distributive desert is conclusive.
类型	Article
语种	英语
收录类别	ESCI
WOS记录号	WOS:000377532800003
WOS关键词	RETRIBUTIVE JUSTICE
WOS类目	Political Science
WOS研究方向	Government & Law
资源类型	期刊论文
条目标识符	http://119.78.100.177/qdio/handle/2XILL650/331544
作者单位	[Malleson, Tom] Western Univ, Kings Univ Coll, Social Justice & Peace Studies, London, ON, Canada
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Malleson, Tom. Offending the One Percent: Seven Arguments Against Distributive Desert[J],2016,38(2):178-200.
APA	Malleson, Tom.(2016).Offending the One Percent: Seven Arguments Against Distributive Desert.NEW POLITICAL SCIENCE,38(2),178-200.
MLA	Malleson, Tom."Offending the One Percent: Seven Arguments Against Distributive Desert".NEW POLITICAL SCIENCE 38.2(2016):178-200.

条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。

个性服务

谷歌学术

百度学术

必应学术

相关权益政策

收藏/分享