Arid
DOI10.1007/s11572-009-9081-x
Revisionism and Desert
Bomann-Larsen, Lene
通讯作者Bomann-Larsen, L
来源期刊CRIMINAL LAW AND PHILOSOPHY
ISSN1871-9791
EISSN1871-9805
出版年2010
卷号4期号:1页码:1-16
英文摘要Revisionists claim that the retributive intuitions informing our responsibility-attributing practices are unwarranted under determinism, not only because they are false, but because if we are all "victims of causal luck'', it is unfair to treat one another as if we are deserving of moral and legal sanctions. One (moderate) revisionist strategy recommends a deflationary concept of moral responsibility, and that we justify punishment in consequentialist rather than retributive terms. Another (strong) revisionist strategy recommends that we eliminate all concepts of guilt, blame and punishment, and treat dangerous criminals as we treat people with contagious diseases. I argue against both strong and moderate revisionism that (1) it is not unfair to hold persons desert-entailingly responsible (in a weaker sense of 'desert') insofar as they take an interest in being treated as appraisable, and (2) that it is unfair to persons not to treat them as desert-entailingly responsible (in this weaker sense) contrary to their interests in being treated as such. The interest-based argument, I conclude, give us a justification for communicating retributive attitudes, but may still require a weak revision of our retributive practices, in the direction of a communicative theory of punishment.
英文关键词Desert Determinism Fairness Justification Retributivism Repentance Revisionism
类型Article
语种英语
收录类别ESCI
WOS记录号WOS:000214508000001
WOS类目Law
WOS研究方向Government & Law
资源类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://119.78.100.177/qdio/handle/2XILL650/329430
作者单位[Bomann-Larsen, Lene] Univ Oslo, Dept Philosophy Class Hist Art & Ideas, POB 1020, N-0315 Oslo, Norway
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Bomann-Larsen, Lene. Revisionism and Desert[J],2010,4(1):1-16.
APA Bomann-Larsen, Lene.(2010).Revisionism and Desert.CRIMINAL LAW AND PHILOSOPHY,4(1),1-16.
MLA Bomann-Larsen, Lene."Revisionism and Desert".CRIMINAL LAW AND PHILOSOPHY 4.1(2010):1-16.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Bomann-Larsen, Lene]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Bomann-Larsen, Lene]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Bomann-Larsen, Lene]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。