Knowledge Resource Center for Ecological Environment in Arid Area
| DOI | 10.5152/B-ENT.2020.19123 |
| Safety and efficacy of the Bonebridge bone conduction implant: a comparative study | |
| Van Deun, Lieselot1; De Voecht, Katleen1; Desloovere, Christian1; Verhaert, Nicolas1,2 | |
| 通讯作者 | Van Deun, Lieselot |
| 来源期刊 | B-ENT
 |
| EISSN | 1781-782X |
| 出版年 | 2020 |
| 卷号 | 16期号:1页码:9-14 |
| 英文摘要 | Objective: We prospectively evaluated safety and clinical efficacy of an active bone conduction implant, named Conebridge, in patients with :::-onductive hearing, loss (CHL).Perforr.nance was cc.,i-rIpared with the preoperatve aided condition_ Methods: Nh-le Cutch-speakng patients were implanted with Bonebridge h--1 a single te.rtary referral center and were followed Lip tor 4 years and 11 months Miean). Six patie.nts had CHL, one had mixed hearing:. loss NHL), and two had single -sided deafness. Pre.c.)pe.rative.ly, patients vvete fitted vvith COnVel'Itional air conduction heari:-T aid.,HA);.-.3.ndlor a bor:e--al'ICJIO:ed HA processor wo:r: on a headband. intra--- al:1d postoperative complication rates were assessea '3, a patients.. Five paf;ents with CHL/MHL part:lcipated in an extensive audiological evaluation, inciLiding regular measurenvents of hearing tilresholds (air and bone conducticNn) speech reception in *.:Iniet ',consonant vowel On 50 nant Or CVC words) and noise sentences), and subjectve satisfaction (Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Ad Benefit questionnaire and the Speech, Sp:atial and Qualities of Hearing Scale). Results: Patients' residual hearing:. was not deteriorated by the implantation. and no adve:se e.vents we :e reported. CHL and NAHL oases n-ledian flinetiOnal gain was 20 dB at activation and remaii:led stable ti-:ereafte4. After 3 mo:-:t.ns, ti:le median wo:d recognitior: score r qu'let at 40 dB A was 80%. The medlan speech reception threshold in no'lse was 4.8 ciB signal to noise ratio 1 year postoperatively. Coniparison with preoperative scores with a b*.pne COndUCtiOn device on a headband revealed 110 significant differences. Questi*.pnnaires demonstrated subjective satisfactnon. Stable Performance was observed along the e.ntre follow-up period_ Conclusion: Etonebridge can be considered o safe and effective treatment option for patients with CHL. |
| 英文关键词 | Bone conduction conductive hearing loss hearing aids |
| 类型 | Article |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| 国家 | Belgium |
| 开放获取类型 | Green Accepted |
| 收录类别 | SCI-E |
| WOS记录号 | WOS:000541457600003 |
| WOS关键词 | MIXED HEARING-LOSS ; INDICATION CRITERIA ; BAHA SYSTEM ; SPEECH ; DEVICE ; LISTENERS ; SENTENCES ; CHILDREN |
| WOS类目 | Otorhinolaryngology |
| WOS研究方向 | Otorhinolaryngology |
| 资源类型 | 期刊论文 |
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.177/qdio/handle/2XILL650/319440 |
| 作者单位 | 1.Univ Hosp Leuven, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Leuven, Belgium; 2.Univ Leuven, Dept Neurosci, Res Grp ExpORL, Leuven, Belgium |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Van Deun, Lieselot,De Voecht, Katleen,Desloovere, Christian,et al. Safety and efficacy of the Bonebridge bone conduction implant: a comparative study[J],2020,16(1):9-14. |
| APA | Van Deun, Lieselot,De Voecht, Katleen,Desloovere, Christian,&Verhaert, Nicolas.(2020).Safety and efficacy of the Bonebridge bone conduction implant: a comparative study.B-ENT,16(1),9-14. |
| MLA | Van Deun, Lieselot,et al."Safety and efficacy of the Bonebridge bone conduction implant: a comparative study".B-ENT 16.1(2020):9-14. |
| 条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 | |||||
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
