干旱区生态环境知识资源中心(Arid): Strains in Sustainability Debates: Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Western Science through the Lens of Extension Agents in a Pastoral Region

Arid

DOI	10.1111/ruso.12268
	Strains in Sustainability Debates: Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Western Science through the Lens of Extension Agents in a Pastoral Region
	Easdale, Marcos H.1,2,3; Leon, Natalia Perez 1,2,3; Aguiar, Martin R.3,4
通讯作者	Easdale, Marcos H.
来源期刊	RURAL SOCIOLOGY
ISSN	0036-0112
EISSN	1549-0831
出版年	2020
卷号	85 期号:1 页码:57-84
英文摘要	Those involved in sustainability debates on developmental pathways concur in the synergistic potential of integrating traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) and Western scientific approaches. Transhumant pastoralism is a livelihood strategy adapted to spatiotemporal environmental variability in many mountainous and arid regions worldwide. This form of livelihood is based on a mobile logic that is increasingly threatened by novel lifestyles promoted from a Western mind-set and by climate change. The aim of this article is to identify and characterize the different perspectives of environmental and social issues in a pastoral region and their association with labor collaboration among extension agents, framed in an institutional action. We tackled the inquiry about viewpoints with Q methodology and related it to regional problems, alternative solutions, and future development pathways for transhumant pastoralism and landscape management in northwest Patagonia. We identified six perspectives and characterized them with their topological position in the social network. Mediating positions registered the highest network centrality of labor collaborations among agents, whereas more dominant perspectives emphasizing TEK or scientific knowledge registered intermediate centrality. There was consensus on the need for sustainable developmental options, but the emphasis on combining knowledge still needs convergent solutions.
类型	Article
语种	英语
国家	Argentina
收录类别	SSCI
WOS记录号	WOS:000519700000003
WOS关键词	Q-METHODOLOGY ; PERSPECTIVE ; RESILIENCE ; TRANSITION ; POLICY ; POWER
WOS类目	Sociology
WOS研究方向	Sociology
资源类型	期刊论文
条目标识符	http://119.78.100.177/qdio/handle/2XILL650/315470
作者单位	1.Inst Invest Forestales & Agr Bariloche, Desarrollo Rural, San Carlos De Bariloche, Rio Negro, Argentina; 2.Inst Nacl Tecnol Agr, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina; 3.Consejo Nacl Invest Cient & Tecn, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina; 4.Univ Buenos Aires, Fac Agron, Catedra Ecol, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Easdale, Marcos H.,Leon, Natalia Perez,Aguiar, Martin R.. Strains in Sustainability Debates: Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Western Science through the Lens of Extension Agents in a Pastoral Region[J],2020,85(1):57-84.
APA	Easdale, Marcos H.,Leon, Natalia Perez,&Aguiar, Martin R..(2020).Strains in Sustainability Debates: Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Western Science through the Lens of Extension Agents in a Pastoral Region.RURAL SOCIOLOGY,85(1),57-84.
MLA	Easdale, Marcos H.,et al."Strains in Sustainability Debates: Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Western Science through the Lens of Extension Agents in a Pastoral Region".RURAL SOCIOLOGY 85.1(2020):57-84.