Knowledge Resource Center for Ecological Environment in Arid Area
DOI | 10.3390/rs12030363 |
Evaluation of the Radar QPE and Rain Gauge Data Merging Methods in Northern China | |
Qiu, Qingtai1; Liu, Jia1; Tian, Jiyang1; Jiao, Yufei1; Li, Chuanzhe1; Wang, Wei1,2; Yu, Fuliang1 | |
通讯作者 | Liu, Jia |
来源期刊 | REMOTE SENSING
![]() |
EISSN | 2072-4292 |
出版年 | 2020 |
卷号 | 12期号:3 |
英文摘要 | Radar-rain gauge merging methods have been widely used to produce high-quality precipitation with fine spatial resolution by combing the advantages of the rain gauge observation and the radar quantitative precipitation estimation (QPE). Different merging methods imply a specific choice on the treatment of radar and rain gauge data. In order to improve their applicability, significant studies have focused on evaluating the performances of the merging methods. In this study, a categorization of the radar-rain gauge merging methods was proposed as: (1) Radar bias adjustment category, (2) radar-rain gauge integration category, and (3) rain gauge interpolation category for a total of six commonly used merging methods, i.e., mean field bias (MFB), regression inverse distance weighting (RIDW), collocated co-kriging (CCok), fast Bayesian regression kriging (FBRK), regression kriging (RK), and kriging with external drift (KED). Eight different storm events were chosen from semi-humid and semi-arid areas of Northern China to test the performance of the six methods. Based on the leave-one-out cross validation (LOOCV), conclusions were obtained that the integration category always performs the best, the bias adjustment category performs the worst, and the interpolation category ranks between them. The quality of the merging products can be a function of the merging method that is affected by both the quality of radar QPE and the ability of the rain gauge to capture small-scale rainfall features. In order to further evaluate the applicability of the merging products, they were then used as the input to a rainfall-runoff model, the Hybrid-Hebei model, for flood forecasting. It is revealed that a higher quality of the merging products indicates a better agreement between the observed and the simulated runoff. |
英文关键词 | weather radar quantitative precipitation estimation rain gauge radar-rain gauge merging leave-one-out cross validation verification |
类型 | Article |
语种 | 英语 |
国家 | Peoples R China |
开放获取类型 | gold |
收录类别 | SCI-E |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000515393800022 |
WOS关键词 | X-BAND RADAR ; PRECIPITATION ESTIMATION ; INTERPOLATION ; UNCERTAINTY ; COMBINATION ; CALIBRATION ; SIMULATION ; ADJUSTMENT ; PREDICTION ; NETWORKS |
WOS类目 | Environmental Sciences ; Geosciences, Multidisciplinary ; Remote Sensing ; Imaging Science & Photographic Technology |
WOS研究方向 | Environmental Sciences & Ecology ; Geology ; Remote Sensing ; Imaging Science & Photographic Technology |
来源机构 | 河海大学 |
资源类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.177/qdio/handle/2XILL650/315414 |
作者单位 | 1.China Inst Water Resources & Hydropower Res, State Key Lab Simulat & Regulat Water Cycle River, Beijing 100038, Peoples R China; 2.Hohai Univ, Coll Hydrol & Water Resources, Nanjing 210098, Peoples R China |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Qiu, Qingtai,Liu, Jia,Tian, Jiyang,et al. Evaluation of the Radar QPE and Rain Gauge Data Merging Methods in Northern China[J]. 河海大学,2020,12(3). |
APA | Qiu, Qingtai.,Liu, Jia.,Tian, Jiyang.,Jiao, Yufei.,Li, Chuanzhe.,...&Yu, Fuliang.(2020).Evaluation of the Radar QPE and Rain Gauge Data Merging Methods in Northern China.REMOTE SENSING,12(3). |
MLA | Qiu, Qingtai,et al."Evaluation of the Radar QPE and Rain Gauge Data Merging Methods in Northern China".REMOTE SENSING 12.3(2020). |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。