Knowledge Resource Center for Ecological Environment in Arid Area
DOI | 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000359 |
Obstetrical Anal Sphincter Injuries: Does Obstetrical Care Provider Matter? A Quality Assurance Study in Ontario | |
Pizzuto, Katerina1; Pudwell, Jessica2; Smith, Graeme N.2; Harvey, Marie-Andree2 | |
通讯作者 | Harvey, Marie-Andree |
会议名称 | Annual Scientific Meeting of the American-Urogynecologic-Society (AUGS) |
会议日期 | SEP 27-OCT 01, 2016 |
会议地点 | Denver, CO |
英文摘要 | Objectives: We sought to determine the rates of obstetrical anal sphincter tears (OASIS) between types of obstetrical care providers at Kingston General Hospital (KGH) and in Ontario via the Better Outcomes Registry Network (BORN). Methods: This cross-sectional study collected patient, demographic, and delivery data from all vaginal deliveries at KGH from June 2011 to June 2014 and all vaginal deliveries through the BORN database from June 2012 to June 2014. Results: During this period, 4.6% and 3.5% of all vaginal deliveries at KGH and in Ontario, respectively, were complicated by OASIS. The OASIS' rates were not statistically different between admitting care providers at KGH: 4.9%, 3.8%, and 3.7% of vaginal deliveries by obstetricians, family physicians, and midwives, respectively, in contrast to a higher rate of OASIS in women admitted under midwifery care in the province-wide data: 3.4%, 3.2%, and 4.4% for obstetricians, family physicians, and midwives, respectively. The rate of OASIS in patients who had an intrapartum transfer of care (TOC) from a family physician or midwife to an obstetrician was 13.8% at KGH, and 13.6% as reported by BORN, significantly higher than 3.8% (KGH) or 2.9% (BORN) in those who remained under the family physician, or midwife. The relative risk of OASIS in women transferred to an obstetrician compared to those who were admitted and delivered by an obstetrician was 3.9 (95% confidence interval, 3.6-4.3, P < 0.0001). Conclusions: Only when an intrapartum TOC is needed does the OASIS rate substantially increase, reflecting the underlying indication for TOC is leading to more intervention associated with risk of OASIS. |
英文关键词 | obstetrical anal sphincter injury obstetrical care provider midwife epidemiology incidence rate |
来源出版物 | FEMALE PELVIC MEDICINE AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY |
ISSN | 2151-8378 |
EISSN | 2154-4212 |
出版年 | 2017 |
卷号 | 23 |
期号 | 2 |
页码 | 90-94 |
出版者 | LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS |
类型 | Article;Proceedings Paper |
语种 | 英语 |
国家 | Canada |
收录类别 | SCI-E ; CPCI-S |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000395579800006 |
WOS关键词 | RISK-FACTORS ; PHYSICIANS ; 3RD-DEGREE ; TEARS ; BIRTH |
WOS类目 | Obstetrics & Gynecology |
WOS研究方向 | Obstetrics & Gynecology |
资源类型 | 会议论文 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.177/qdio/handle/2XILL650/306483 |
作者单位 | 1.Queens Univ, Sch Med, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada; 2.Kingston Gen Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 76 Stuart St, Kingston, ON K7L 2V7, Canada |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Pizzuto, Katerina,Pudwell, Jessica,Smith, Graeme N.,et al. Obstetrical Anal Sphincter Injuries: Does Obstetrical Care Provider Matter? A Quality Assurance Study in Ontario[C]:LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS,2017:90-94. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。