Knowledge Resource Center for Ecological Environment in Arid Area
| 报告编号 | ADA575998 |
| What Happened to Battlefield Air Interdiction. Army and Air Force Battlefield Doctrine Development from Pre-Desert Storm to 2001. | |
| McCaffrey, I. T. | |
| 英文摘要 | The ground and air forces have strong interlocking connections in the battlefield operations known as close air support (CAS). In the 1970s the Army and Air Force began to develop a shared battlefield doctrine known as battlefield air interdiction (BAI) that was concerned with a class of targets that lay out a fair distance from the front lines. These targets were beyond the capability and immediate tactical concern of the ground commander, beyond the area that required detailed coordination of each individual CAS mission, but were close enough to have a near-term effect upon surface operation and required a general coordination of both air and ground operations. These became known as ’intermediate’ targets, and often considered ’shallow interdiction’ targets closer to the front lines than the traditional interdiction targets commonly tasked by and under the control of the air forces. The Air Force and Army worked hand in glove through the seventies to refine and publish battlefield doctrine, best recognized under its Army label, AirLand Battle. Through the eighties Gen Wilbur L. Creech, Tactical Air Command commander, Gen Donald Starry, chief of Army Training and Doctrine Command, and other service leaders worked on a series of historical compromises pertaining to all aspects of the Army-Air Force operations. Not more than 10 years later, on the battlefields of Desert Storm, the Air Force excluded BAI from its air tasking orders. Indeed, the term BAI was removed from doctrinal manuals written after 1990. Lt Col Terrance J. McCaffrey III traces air-ground doctrine and operational practices relative to battlefield interdiction from World War I through the decade after Operation Desert Storm. Lt Col McCaffrey concludes that there is still need for a BAI-type mission. This study illuminates the process that will lead to renew BAI even as the struggle for service missions continue to cause self-interested debate. |
| 英文关键词 | Air force Air land battles Army Battlefields Interdiction Military doctrine Military history Air force operations Army operations Joint military activities Persian gulf war Surface targets Battlefield air interdiction Airland bat |
| 出版年 | 2004 |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| 国家 | United States |
| 来源学科分类 | 92D - Education, Law, & Humanities ; 74G - Military Operations, Strategy, & Tactics |
| URL | http://r.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?DbCode=KJBG&dbname=KJBGW&filename=59fb0f3f31c97d1d549e74bf |
| 来源机构 | Non Paid ADAS |
| 资源类型 | 科技报告 |
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.177/qdio/handle/2XILL650/273212 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | McCaffrey, I. T.. What Happened to Battlefield Air Interdiction. Army and Air Force Battlefield Doctrine Development from Pre-Desert Storm to 2001.,2004. |
| 条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 | |||||
| 个性服务 |
| 推荐该条目 |
| 保存到收藏夹 |
| 导出为Endnote文件 |
| 谷歌学术 |
| 谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
| [McCaffrey, I. T.]的文章 |
| 百度学术 |
| 百度学术中相似的文章 |
| [McCaffrey, I. T.]的文章 |
| 必应学术 |
| 必应学术中相似的文章 |
| [McCaffrey, I. T.]的文章 |
| 相关权益政策 |
| 暂无数据 |
| 收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
