Knowledge Resource Center for Ecological Environment in Arid Area
| Rethinking Zimbabwean Agricultural Land Expropriation Laws in Light of the Funnekotter Case | |
| Moyo;Busani | |
| 出版年 | 2016 |
| 英文摘要 | This study examines whether or not the Zimbabwean agricultural land expropriation laws are consistent with its international legal commitments and obligations enumerated in Article 6 of the Zimbabwe-Netherlands BIT which were expounded in the Funnekotter case. It begins by exploring the concept of expropriation, and the main features of the Zimbabwe's agricultural land expropriation laws, and proceeds to discuss the conditions of expropriation enumerated in Article 6 using the Funnekotter case as a compass, before examining whether or not the Zimbabwe's agricultural land expropriation laws are compatible with article 6 conditions of expropriation. The main conclusion reached is that despite the good intentions and public interests pursued by these agricultural land expropriation laws, they are draconian, and inconsistent with the due process, non-discrimination, and compensation conditions of expropriation. Thus, Zimbabwe may have to re-think its agricultural land expropriation laws in light of the Funnekotter case. tm2017 Centre for Human Rights LLM Unrestricted |
| 英文关键词 | UCTD |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| URL | http://hdl.handle.net/2263/58731 |
| 资源类型 | 学位论文 |
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.177/qdio/handle/2XILL650/250025 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Moyo;Busani. Rethinking Zimbabwean Agricultural Land Expropriation Laws in Light of the Funnekotter Case[D],2016. |
| 条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 | |||||
| 个性服务 |
| 推荐该条目 |
| 保存到收藏夹 |
| 导出为Endnote文件 |
| 谷歌学术 |
| 谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
| [Moyo;Busani]的文章 |
| 百度学术 |
| 百度学术中相似的文章 |
| [Moyo;Busani]的文章 |
| 必应学术 |
| 必应学术中相似的文章 |
| [Moyo;Busani]的文章 |
| 相关权益政策 |
| 暂无数据 |
| 收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
