干旱区生态环境知识资源中心(Arid): 基于北京、广州及和田等地主要地面气候指标探讨燥邪的实验室模拟

Arid

	基于北京、广州及和田等地主要地面气候指标探讨燥邪的实验室模拟
其他题名	Exploration on the laboratory simulation of dryness pathogen based on main surface climate indexes in Beijing, Guangzhou, Hetian and other two places
	史红 1; 张晶芳 1; 郝冉 1; 陈彦竹 1; 陈家旭(指导)2
来源期刊	中华中医药杂志
ISSN	1673-1727
出版年	2019
卷号	34 期号:4 页码:1726-1730
中文摘要	目的:分析日均相对湿度(DM R H)与日温差(DR T)等主要地面气象指标的相关性,探讨实验室模拟燥邪时各因素的配置。方法:以北京、广州、哈尔滨、九龙、和田2006年至2015年气象学数据为背景,设DMRH为燥邪第一要素,比较其与DRT、日均气温(DMT)、日均风速(DMWS)及日照总时数(DTBSD)的相关强度,并据其与方域、时令的相互关系选择参照以制定燥邪模拟方案。结果:①和田春季DM RH最低[(29.8417.05)%,P<0.01];②与DMRH相关最强者,在北京、哈尔滨是DMWS,在广州为DTBSD,在和田、九龙是DRT;③从季节出发,与和田DMRH密切相关的是DRT和DMT;④和田夏秋DRT差异无统计学意义,春冬DTBSD差异无统计学意义,其它气象指标季节间差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);⑤和田DMRH呈现冬>夏秋>春的特点(P<0.01),DRT呈现夏秋>春>冬的趋势(P<0.01),DMWS、DMT、DTBSD均有夏>秋>春>冬的特点(P<0.01)。结论:①以日为单位在特定温区内控制相对湿度[DMRH=(24.3311.29)%,5%≤RH≤45%]是模拟燥邪的关键;②可分别参考和田四季和春秋两季的气候特点模拟方域性燥邪与季节性燥邪(温燥和凉燥)。
英文摘要	Objective: To explore the laboratory simulation of dryness pathogen based on correlation analysis DMRH and main surface climate indexes such as DRT. Methods: Based on meteorological data from Beijing, Guangzhou, Harbin, Kowloon and Hetian from 2006 to 2015, to set DMRH as the decisive physical index of dryness pathogen, then to compare the correlation intensity between DMRH and DRT, DMT, DMWS and DTBSD, still basing on the relationship between the correlation intensity and location, season as well, to select the reference which is the dependence of simulation scheme of dryness pathogen. Results: ①The lowest DMRH appears in spring of Hetian [(29.8417.05)%, P<0.01]. ②DMWS is the closest correlated intensity index with DMRH in Beijing and Harbin, DTBSD in Guangzhou, DRT in Hetian and Kowloon in corresponding. ③Starting from the season, DRT and DMT closely correlate with DMRH in Hetian. ④In Hetian, no DRT difference exists between summer and autumn, also no DTBSD difference exists between spring and winter and mean values of other meteorological indicators have seasonal differences (P<0.01). ⑤In Hetian, DMRH in winter is higher than it in summer and autumn, the latter two is higher than it in spring (P<0.01), DRT in summer and autumn is higher than it in spring, the latter one is higher than it in winter (P<0.01). As regards DMWS, DMT and DTBSDF, from high to low, it is summer, autumn, spring and winter in terns (P<0.01). Conclusion: ①Controlling DMRH [DMRH=(24.3311.29)%, 5%≤RH≤45%] is the key to simulating dryness pathogen. ②To refer to the weather condition of four seasons in Hetian to simulate regional dryness evil,and to refer to the weather condition of spring and autumn in Hetian to simulate seasonal dryness evil.
中文关键词	干旱环境 ; 燥邪 ; 地面气象指标 ; 物理要素 ; 日节律 ; 季节律
英文关键词	Arid weather condition Dryness pathogen Surface climate indexes Physical element Daily rhythm Seasonal rhythm
语种	中文
国家	中国
收录类别	CSCD
WOS类目	MEDICINE GENERAL INTERNAL
WOS研究方向	General & Internal Medicine
CSCD记录号	CSCD:6471149
资源类型	期刊论文
条目标识符	http://119.78.100.177/qdio/handle/2XILL650/239850
作者单位	1.新疆医科大学中医学院, 乌鲁木齐, 新疆 830011, 中国; 2.北京中医药大学, 北京 100029, 中国
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	史红,张晶芳,郝冉,等. 基于北京、广州及和田等地主要地面气候指标探讨燥邪的实验室模拟[J],2019,34(4):1726-1730.
APA	史红,张晶芳,郝冉,陈彦竹,&陈家旭.(2019).基于北京、广州及和田等地主要地面气候指标探讨燥邪的实验室模拟.中华中医药杂志,34(4),1726-1730.
MLA	史红,et al."基于北京、广州及和田等地主要地面气候指标探讨燥邪的实验室模拟".中华中医药杂志 34.4(2019):1726-1730.