Knowledge Resource Center for Ecological Environment in Arid Area
基于RUE的不同草地类生态评价研究以河西走廊为例 | |
其他题名 | The Ecological Assessment of Different Rangeland Types Based on Rainfall Use Efficiency in Hexi Corridor Area |
王贵珍; 马素洁; 杨思维; 牛钰杰; 花立民 | |
来源期刊 | 自然资源学报
![]() |
ISSN | 1000-3037 |
出版年 | 2017 |
卷号 | 32期号:4页码:582-594 |
中文摘要 | 选择降水利用效率(RUE)作为评价指标,对河西走廊代表性草地类温性荒漠、高寒草甸、温性草原进行生态评价研究。通过植被指数提取、降水Co-Kriging插值、图层叠加,得到河西走廊区域20062010年的RUE(NDVI)、RUE(PVI)、RUE(TSAVI)数据,并与地上生物量进行相关分析,筛选出适合不同草地类的RUE作为该区域生态评价的指标。结果表明:1)温性荒漠区RUE(PVI)与草地生物量风干重正相关性最高(R2=0.879),高寒草甸区RUE(NDVI)与草地生物量风干重的正相关性最高(R~2=0.876),温性草原区RUE(TSAVI)与草地生物量风干重的正相关性最高(R~2=0.895)。2)温性荒漠区、温性草原区生态均处于退化过程,高寒草甸区处于恢复过程。研究认为选择合适的RUE值可作为不同草地类生态评价指标,并具有理论的可行性和实践的可靠性。 |
英文摘要 | Using rainfall use efficiency (RUE) as index, we carried out the ecological assessment of typical rangeland types in Hexi Corridor, including temperate desert, alpine meadow and temperate rangeland. By extracting vegetation index, interpreting rainfall with Co-Kriging method and overlying multiple maps, we obtained RUE(NDVI), RUE(PVI) and RUE (TSAVI) in Hexi Corridor. By crrelation analysis between different RUEs and aboveground biomass, suitable RUE for each type of rangeland is selected as index to evaluate the ecological process. The result showed that: 1) The correlation between RUE(PVI) and aboveground biomass is the highest in temperate desert, correlation coefficient being 0.879. The correlation between RUE(NDVI) and aboveground biomass is the highest in alpine meadow, correlation coefficient being 0.876. The correlation between RUE(TSAVI) and aboveground biomass is the highest in temperate rangeland, correlation coefficient being 0.895. 2) The temperate desert is in ecological degraded process, since RUE(PVI) in the range of -11.291--2.000, -1.999-0.000 and 2.001-6.000 is in increasing trend and RUE(PVI) in the range of 0.001-2.000 and 6.001- 43.918 is in decreasing trend. The temperate rangeland is also in ecological degraded process, since RUE(TSAVI) in the range of -3.2*10~(-3)-0.8*10~(-3) and 1.4*10~(-3)-2.4*10~(-3) is in increasing trend and RUE(TSAVI) in the range of 0.8 * 10~(-3)- 1.4 * 10~(-3) and 2.4 * 10~(-3)- 3.4 * 10~(-3) is in decreasing trend. On opposite, alpine meadow is in ecological recovery process, since RUE (NDVI) in the range of 18.001-36.000 is in decreasing trend and RUE(NDVI) in the range of - 6.765- 6.000, 6.001- 10.000 and 10.001- 18.000 is in increasing trend. We believe that selecting appropriate RUE for different type of rangeland as the assessment index is feasible and reliable in theory and practice. |
中文关键词 | 降水利用效率 ; 温性荒漠 ; 高寒草甸 ; 温性草原 ; 河西走廊 ; 生态评价 |
英文关键词 | rainfall use efficiency temperate desert alpine meadow temperate rangeland Hexi Corridor ecological assessment |
语种 | 中文 |
国家 | 中国 |
收录类别 | CSCD |
WOS类目 | AGRICULTURE MULTIDISCIPLINARY ; ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES |
WOS研究方向 | Agriculture ; Environmental Sciences & Ecology |
CSCD记录号 | CSCD:5964604 |
来源机构 | 甘肃农业大学 |
资源类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.177/qdio/handle/2XILL650/237249 |
作者单位 | 甘肃农业大学草业学院, 中-美草地畜牧业可持续发展研究中心;;草业生态系统教育部重点实验室;;甘肃省草业工程实验室, 兰州, 甘肃 730070, 中国 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | 王贵珍,马素洁,杨思维,等. 基于RUE的不同草地类生态评价研究以河西走廊为例[J]. 甘肃农业大学,2017,32(4):582-594. |
APA | 王贵珍,马素洁,杨思维,牛钰杰,&花立民.(2017).基于RUE的不同草地类生态评价研究以河西走廊为例.自然资源学报,32(4),582-594. |
MLA | 王贵珍,et al."基于RUE的不同草地类生态评价研究以河西走廊为例".自然资源学报 32.4(2017):582-594. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[王贵珍]的文章 |
[马素洁]的文章 |
[杨思维]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[王贵珍]的文章 |
[马素洁]的文章 |
[杨思维]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[王贵珍]的文章 |
[马素洁]的文章 |
[杨思维]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。