Knowledge Resource Center for Ecological Environment in Arid Area
塔里木盆地绿洲参考作物蒸散量计算方法比较 | |
其他题名 | Comparison of methods for estimating reference evapotranspiration in oasis of Tarim Basin |
高飞; 李新虎 | |
来源期刊 | 干旱区地理
![]() |
ISSN | 1000-6060 |
出版年 | 2016 |
卷号 | 39期号:1页码:130-135 |
中文摘要 | 应用FAO-56 Penman-Monteith、1972 Kimberly Penman、FAO PPP-17 Penman、FAO-24 Radiation、1985 Hargreaves、1948 Penman、Priestley-Taylor和1957 Makkink 8种公式计算了塔里木盆地绿洲棉区的参考作物蒸散量,并对8种方法的计算结果进行了比较,结果表明:1972 Kimberly Penman的计算结果与标准方法FAO-56 Penman-Monteith的计算结果最接近,FAO-24 Radiation的计算结果与标准方法FAO-56 Penman-Monteith的计算结果差异最大。在估算塔里木盆地绿洲棉区的参考作物蒸散量时,可选用1972 Kimberly Penman公式。 |
英文摘要 | Evapotranspiration is a complex process and appears in both water balance equation and land surface energy balance equation. It is practically and scientifically significant for water resources management and ecological restoration to evaluate the applicability of ETo models. Eight alternative ETo methods, including the FAO-56 Penman-Monteith, 1972 Kimberly Penman,FAO PPP-17 Penman,FAO-24 Radiation, 1985 Hargreaves, 1948 Penman, Priestley-Taylor and 1957 Makkink were evaluated for use in oasis of Traim Basin at Aksu Water Balance Experimental Station during the period of 2008 to 2012. The results showed that: ETo estimates produced by 1972 Kimberly Penman were very near, in general, to those by FAO-56 Penman-Monteith,but ETo estimates produced by FAO-24 Radiation were very far from those by FAO-56 Penman-Monteith. Monthy ETo derived from all the equations appeared to follow the same trend that the ETo value would go up from April to June,reach the maximum in July and go down from August to September. Compared to FAO-56 Penman-Monteith, the results from 1972 Kimberly Penman and 1957 Makkink were lower, while others were higher. The value of D, EF and RMSE ranged from 0.91 to 0.99,0.83 to 0.99 and 0.23 to 0.99, respectively. Therein, the 1972 Kimberly Penman obtained the maximum D and EF of 0.99 and 0.99,respectively, and the minimum RMSE of 0.23,therefore, the 1972 Kimberly Penman is the most suitable method for the calculation of reference evapotranspiration in oasis of Tarim Basin. |
中文关键词 | 塔里木盆地绿洲 ; 参考作物蒸散量 ; 计算方法 |
英文关键词 | oasis of Traim Basin reference evapotranspiration calculation methods |
语种 | 中文 |
国家 | 中国 |
收录类别 | CSCD |
WOS类目 | GEOSCIENCES MULTIDISCIPLINARY |
WOS研究方向 | Geology |
CSCD记录号 | CSCD:5630735 |
来源机构 | 中国科学院新疆生态与地理研究所 |
资源类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.177/qdio/handle/2XILL650/234224 |
作者单位 | 中国科学院新疆生态与地理研究所, 荒漠与绿洲生态国家重点实验室, 乌鲁木齐, 新疆 830011, 中国 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | 高飞,李新虎. 塔里木盆地绿洲参考作物蒸散量计算方法比较[J]. 中国科学院新疆生态与地理研究所,2016,39(1):130-135. |
APA | 高飞,&李新虎.(2016).塔里木盆地绿洲参考作物蒸散量计算方法比较.干旱区地理,39(1),130-135. |
MLA | 高飞,et al."塔里木盆地绿洲参考作物蒸散量计算方法比较".干旱区地理 39.1(2016):130-135. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[高飞]的文章 |
[李新虎]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[高飞]的文章 |
[李新虎]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[高飞]的文章 |
[李新虎]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。