干旱区生态环境知识资源中心(Arid): 沙漠化地区两种生态治理政策交易成本的比较研究

Arid

	沙漠化地区两种生态治理政策交易成本的比较研究
其他题名	Comparative Analysis on Transaction Cost of Two Ecology Management Policies in Sandy Desertification Areas of China
	樊胜岳; 赵丹华; 兰健; 徐均
来源期刊	中国沙漠
ISSN	1000-694X
出版年	2013
卷号	33 期号:4 页码:1211-1216
中文摘要	本文将交易成本分析引入沙漠化地区生态治理政策分析过程,构建生态治理政策交易成本分析框架,确定交易成本计算方法,估算内蒙古乌审旗退耕还林政策执行期间的交易成本为每年4 931.92元·hm~(-2)。其中,政府直接支付占交易成本的50.06%,农户支付占交易成本的46.86%,政府直接支付是退耕还林机会成本的118.75%。草原休牧政策执行期间的交易成本为每年906.07元·hm~(-2),政府直接支付占交易成本的12.86%,农户支付占交易成本的80.35%,政府直接支付是草原休牧机会成本的23.30%。退耕还林政策的政府支付与退耕还林的机会成本大致相同,因此该政策执行效果良好,并且实现了退耕还林地区的全面禁牧。草原休牧政策的政府支付达不到休牧机会成本的1/4,牧民利益受到损失,牧民偷牧率达到100%,致使草原休牧流于形式。生态治理政策的交易成本分析,将为不同生态治理政策的比较和绩效评价提供一个新的角度,具有重要意义。
英文摘要	This paper introduces transaction cost to the analysis on ecology management policy in sandy desertification areas, builds transaction cost analysis framework of ecology management policy, and determine the method to calculate the transaction cost. As a result, we estimate that the transaction cost in the project of restoring farmland to forest is about 4 931.92 Yuan·hm~(-2) every year,with government direct payment accounting for 50.06% and farmers taking 46.86% of the total transaction costs. Government direct payment takes 118.75% of the opportunity cost of restoring farmland to forest. The transaction cost in rest-grazing is 906.06 Yuan·hm~(-2) every year, with government direct payments accounting for 12.86% and farmers taking 80.35% of the total transaction cost. Government direct payment takes 23.30% of the opportunity cost of rest-grazing. The government direct payment of restoring farmland to forest is roughly the same as the opportunity cost of reusing farmland for other purposes. The figures indicate that the implementation of this policy has good effect, and the purpose of graze-prohibiting is achieved in restoring farmland to forest areas. The government payment for rest-grazing cannot reach 1/4 of the opportunity cost of rest-grazing, and the rate of grazing secretly is 100%, the purpose of rest-grazing cannot be achieved. The transaction cost analysis on ecological policy has great significance because of the new perspective it has provided for the ecology management policies performance evaluation and comparative study.
中文关键词	生态治理政策 ; 交易成本 ; 沙漠化 ; 制度分析
英文关键词	ecology management policy transaction cost sandy desertification institution analysis
语种	中文
国家	中国
收录类别	CSCD
WOS类目	ECONOMICS
WOS研究方向	Business & Economics
CSCD记录号	CSCD:4895077
资源类型	期刊论文
条目标识符	http://119.78.100.177/qdio/handle/2XILL650/230640
作者单位	中央民族大学经济学院, 北京 100081, 中国
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	樊胜岳,赵丹华,兰健,等. 沙漠化地区两种生态治理政策交易成本的比较研究[J],2013,33(4):1211-1216.
APA	樊胜岳,赵丹华,兰健,&徐均.(2013).沙漠化地区两种生态治理政策交易成本的比较研究.中国沙漠,33(4),1211-1216.
MLA	樊胜岳,et al."沙漠化地区两种生态治理政策交易成本的比较研究".中国沙漠 33.4(2013):1211-1216.