Arid
DOI10.3390/su11154122
Analysis of Socioeconomic Impacts of the FSC and PEFC Certification Systems on Business Entities and Consumers
Michal, Jakub1; Brezina, David1; Safarik, Dalibor1; Kupcak, Vaclav1; Sujova, Andrea1; Fialova, Jitka2
通讯作者Sujova, Andrea
来源期刊SUSTAINABILITY
EISSN2071-1050
出版年2019
卷号11期号:15
英文摘要The article discusses the issues of effectiveness of the FSC (Forest Stewardship Council) and PEFC (Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification) certification systems in relation to enterprises and the level to which the systems which present sustainability as a part of their ethos are accepted by consumers. The justifiability and topicality of this issue result from the increasingly strong interest in sustainability of the society as a whole as well as from the long-term vision of sector policies with respect to meeting the objectives of sustainable development. The increasing demand for natural resources exerts pressure on our planet. Sustainability is hence essential for our future and has long been in the centre of the European project. Its economic, social and environmental aspects which form the common objective of society have been acknowledged in EU agreements. A principal document of a global nature is the 2030 UN Agenda for Development, a sustainability programme which has the sustainability of forest ecosystems established in its Goal 15: Protect, restore and promote sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, and halt and reverse land degradation and halt biodiversity loss. Visions, direction and goals of sustainable development have also been stipulated in the Paris Agreement on climate change (COP21), in the Addis Ababa action programme and in The Future We Want declaration, namely in its Chapter II, which appeals to enterprises and industries for developing strategies which would contribute to sustainable development. This study aims to analyse and assess the justifiability of the existence of certification systems in relation to processing operators and end consumers in the Czech Republic. From the results of the study, it can be concluded that, despite the strong representation of selected certification systems in the Czech Republic, their effectiveness in economic, social and environmental terms is not perceived exclusively positive by businesses and consumers.
英文关键词sustainable management forest sustainability FSC PEFC effectiveness
类型Article
语种英语
国家Czech Republic
开放获取类型gold
收录类别SCI-E ; SSCI
WOS记录号WOS:000485230200127
WOS关键词WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY ; CERTIFIED WOOD PRODUCTS ; FOREST CERTIFICATION ; CUSTODY CERTIFICATION ; EXPLORATORY ASSESSMENT ; CHAIN ; MANUFACTURERS ; MODEL ; CHOICES
WOS类目Green & Sustainable Science & Technology ; Environmental Sciences ; Environmental Studies
WOS研究方向Science & Technology - Other Topics ; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
资源类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://119.78.100.177/qdio/handle/2XILL650/219017
作者单位1.Mendel Univ Brno, Fac Forestry & Wood Technol, Dept Forest & Wood Prod Econ & Policy, Brno 61300, Czech Republic;
2.Mendel Univ Brno, Fac Forestry & Wood Technol, Dept Landscape Management, Brno 61300, Czech Republic
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Michal, Jakub,Brezina, David,Safarik, Dalibor,et al. Analysis of Socioeconomic Impacts of the FSC and PEFC Certification Systems on Business Entities and Consumers[J],2019,11(15).
APA Michal, Jakub,Brezina, David,Safarik, Dalibor,Kupcak, Vaclav,Sujova, Andrea,&Fialova, Jitka.(2019).Analysis of Socioeconomic Impacts of the FSC and PEFC Certification Systems on Business Entities and Consumers.SUSTAINABILITY,11(15).
MLA Michal, Jakub,et al."Analysis of Socioeconomic Impacts of the FSC and PEFC Certification Systems on Business Entities and Consumers".SUSTAINABILITY 11.15(2019).
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Michal, Jakub]的文章
[Brezina, David]的文章
[Safarik, Dalibor]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Michal, Jakub]的文章
[Brezina, David]的文章
[Safarik, Dalibor]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Michal, Jakub]的文章
[Brezina, David]的文章
[Safarik, Dalibor]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。