Knowledge Resource Center for Ecological Environment in Arid Area
| DOI | 10.1017/S0265052519000244 |
| GUILT, GRIEF, AND THE GOOD | |
| Robinson, Michael | |
| 通讯作者 | Robinson, Michael |
| 来源期刊 | SOCIAL PHILOSOPHY & POLICY
 |
| ISSN | 0265-0525 |
| EISSN | 1471-6437 |
| 出版年 | 2019 |
| 卷号 | 36期号:1页码:211-233 |
| 英文摘要 | In this essay, I consider a particular version of the thesis that the blameworthy deserve to suffer, namely, that they deserve to feel guilty to the proper degree (a thesis I call Desert-Guilt). Two further theses have been thought to explicate and support the thesis, one that appeals to the non-instrumental goodness of the blameworthy receiving what they deserve (in this case, the experience of guilt), and the other that appeals to the idea that being blameworthy provides reason to promote the blameworthy receiving what they deserve (again, in this case, the experience of guilt). I call the first Good-Guilt and the second Reason-Guilt. I begin by exploring what I take to be the strongest argument for Good-Guilt which gains force from a comparison of guilt and grief, and the strongest argument against. I conclude that Good-Guilt might be true, but that even if it is, the strongest argument in favor of it fails to support it in a way that provides reason for the thesis that the blameworthy deserve to feel guilty. I then consider the hypothesis that Reason-Guilt might be true and might be the more fundamental principle, supporting both Good-Guilt and Desert-Guilt. I argue that it does not succeed, however, and instead propose a different principle, according to which being blameworthy does not by itself provide reason for promoting that the blameworthy get what they deserve, but that being blameworthy systematically does so in conjunction with particular kinds of background circumstances. Finally, I conclude that Desert-Guilt might yet be true, but that it does not clearly gain support from either Good-Guilt or Reason-Guilt. |
| 英文关键词 | guilt responsibility desert blameworthiness retributivism caring grief fittingness |
| 类型 | Article |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| 国家 | USA |
| 收录类别 | SSCI ; AHCI |
| WOS记录号 | WOS:000485020600012 |
| WOS关键词 | FRANKFURT ; RESPONSIBILITY ; PRINCIPLE ; FREEDOM |
| WOS类目 | Ethics ; Philosophy ; Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary |
| WOS研究方向 | Social Sciences - Other Topics ; Philosophy |
| 资源类型 | 期刊论文 |
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.177/qdio/handle/2XILL650/218856 |
| 作者单位 | Chapman Univ, Philosophy, Orange, CA 92866 USA |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Robinson, Michael. GUILT, GRIEF, AND THE GOOD[J],2019,36(1):211-233. |
| APA | Robinson, Michael.(2019).GUILT, GRIEF, AND THE GOOD.SOCIAL PHILOSOPHY & POLICY,36(1),211-233. |
| MLA | Robinson, Michael."GUILT, GRIEF, AND THE GOOD".SOCIAL PHILOSOPHY & POLICY 36.1(2019):211-233. |
| 条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 | |||||
| 个性服务 |
| 推荐该条目 |
| 保存到收藏夹 |
| 导出为Endnote文件 |
| 谷歌学术 |
| 谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
| [Robinson, Michael]的文章 |
| 百度学术 |
| 百度学术中相似的文章 |
| [Robinson, Michael]的文章 |
| 必应学术 |
| 必应学术中相似的文章 |
| [Robinson, Michael]的文章 |
| 相关权益政策 |
| 暂无数据 |
| 收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
