Knowledge Resource Center for Ecological Environment in Arid Area
DOI | 10.12891/ceog4652.2019 |
The impact of national guidelines on EBM implementation in clinical practice: a comparison between the practices in two countries | |
Zahumensky, J.1,2; Psenkova, P.1,2; Janku, P.3,4; Ventruba, P.3,4 | |
通讯作者 | Psenkova, P. |
来源期刊 | CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
![]() |
ISSN | 0390-6663 |
出版年 | 2019 |
卷号 | 46期号:3页码:413-417 |
英文摘要 | Objective: To determine if the application of guidelines for obstetrical anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) management adopted by professional society in a country improves healthcare compared to a country where the guidelines are not adopted. Materials and Methods: In 2008 and 2016, a questionnaire was sent to every maternity ward in the Czech and Slovak Republics. In 2011, the guidelines for OASIS management were published in the Czech Republic. The authors compared the changes in the management of OASIS in both countries and evaluated the effect of the guidelines on healthcare improvement. Results: In 2008, the current Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) classification of OASIS was not used by any hospital in both countries. In 2016, the classification was used by 48.8% of hospitals in the Czech Republic and by 11.5% of hospitals in the Slovak Republic. The percentage of hospitals in the Czech Republic which used antibiotic prophylaxis while treating OASIS increased from 87.3% in 2008 to 100% in 2016. In the Slovak Republic, the percentage decreased from 85.7% to 73.1%. Active follow-up increased in the Czech Republic from 40% to 70.8%. In the Slovak Republic, it increased from 33.3% to 38.5%. In 2008, the management according to EBM was not performed by any of centres participating in the survey. In 2016, this percentage increased to 34.1% in the Czech Republic and to 3.8% in the Slovak Republic. Conclusion: The introduction of guidelines improved healthcare more significantly compared to the country where guidelines are not yet adopted. |
英文关键词 | Guideline adherence Obstetrical anal sphincter injuries OASIS management EBM |
类型 | Article |
语种 | 英语 |
国家 | Slovakia ; Czech Republic |
收录类别 | SCI-E |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000475301100014 |
WOS关键词 | ANAL-SPHINCTER INJURY ; PRIMARY REPAIR ; MANAGEMENT ; DEFECTS ; OASIS |
WOS类目 | Obstetrics & Gynecology |
WOS研究方向 | Obstetrics & Gynecology |
资源类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.177/qdio/handle/2XILL650/214928 |
作者单位 | 1.Univ Hosp Bratislava, Dept Obstet & Gynecol 2, Ruzinovska 6, Bratislava 82106, Slovakia; 2.Comenius Univ, Ruzinovska 6, Bratislava 82106, Slovakia; 3.Brno Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Brno, Czech Republic; 4.Masaryk Univ, Med Sch, Brno, Czech Republic |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Zahumensky, J.,Psenkova, P.,Janku, P.,et al. The impact of national guidelines on EBM implementation in clinical practice: a comparison between the practices in two countries[J],2019,46(3):413-417. |
APA | Zahumensky, J.,Psenkova, P.,Janku, P.,&Ventruba, P..(2019).The impact of national guidelines on EBM implementation in clinical practice: a comparison between the practices in two countries.CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY,46(3),413-417. |
MLA | Zahumensky, J.,et al."The impact of national guidelines on EBM implementation in clinical practice: a comparison between the practices in two countries".CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY 46.3(2019):413-417. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。