Knowledge Resource Center for Ecological Environment in Arid Area
DOI | 10.15666/aeer/1704_1023910251 |
COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT DETERMINING METHODS OF REFERENCE ETo BASED ON LIMITED WEATHER CONDITIONS IN GAP REGION | |
Aydin, Y. | |
通讯作者 | Aydin, Y. |
来源期刊 | APPLIED ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH
![]() |
ISSN | 1589-1623 |
EISSN | 1785-0037 |
出版年 | 2019 |
卷号 | 17期号:4页码:10239-10251 |
英文摘要 | Reference crop evapotranspiration (ETo) is among the most important components of the hydrologic cycle. Standard FAO-Penman-Monteith method is the most frequently used equation to estimate of ETo. However, the usability of this method is limited due to its complexity HargreaveasSamani (HS) and Turc methods that can be operated with limited data such as temperature and solar radiation are used as an alternative to the standard method. In the present study, the reference ETo values estimated with FAO-PM as the standard method, Hargreaveas-Samani and Turc methods were compared at semi-arid climate conditions. Based on the acquired results; highest R-2 value at the GAP region with semi-arid climate conditions was determined as 0.9872 from the monthly averages of ETo-PM and ETo-HS comparison, whereas the lowest RMSE value was also obtained from the same monthly comparison (0.08). ETo-Turc method yielded a monthly average comparison of 0.981 for the R-2 values comparison. While ETo-CAP put forth the lowest values for all three intervals. It is suggested that HS method can be used instead of Standart Penman-Monteith method (FAO-PM) under GAP region semi arid climate conditions for reference ETo estimation if Penman-Monteith can not be calculated. The Turc method is also can be a good alternative to estimate potential evapotranspiration that can be measured by Class A pan. And that ETo estimation should be made by determining the K-p value in case CAP based ETo estimation is carried out. |
英文关键词 | reference ETo FAO-PM equation Hargreaves-Samani equation Turc equation pistachio |
类型 | Article |
语种 | 英语 |
国家 | Turkey |
开放获取类型 | gold |
收录类别 | SCI-E |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000478066700207 |
WOS关键词 | REFERENCE EVAPOTRANSPIRATION METHODS |
WOS类目 | Ecology ; Environmental Sciences |
WOS研究方向 | Environmental Sciences & Ecology |
资源类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.177/qdio/handle/2XILL650/214241 |
作者单位 | Siirt Univ, Fac Agr, Dept Biosyst Engn, Siirt, Turkey |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Aydin, Y.. COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT DETERMINING METHODS OF REFERENCE ETo BASED ON LIMITED WEATHER CONDITIONS IN GAP REGION[J],2019,17(4):10239-10251. |
APA | Aydin, Y..(2019).COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT DETERMINING METHODS OF REFERENCE ETo BASED ON LIMITED WEATHER CONDITIONS IN GAP REGION.APPLIED ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH,17(4),10239-10251. |
MLA | Aydin, Y.."COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT DETERMINING METHODS OF REFERENCE ETo BASED ON LIMITED WEATHER CONDITIONS IN GAP REGION".APPLIED ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH 17.4(2019):10239-10251. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[Aydin, Y.]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[Aydin, Y.]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[Aydin, Y.]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。