Knowledge Resource Center for Ecological Environment in Arid Area
DOI | 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.08.027 |
Groundwater spring potential modelling: Comprising the capability and robustness of three different modeling approaches | |
Rahmati, Omid1; Naghibi, Seyed Amir2; Shahabi, Himan3; Dieu Tien Bui4; Pradhan, Biswajeet5,6; Azareh, Ali7; Rafiei-Sardooi, Elham8; Samani, Aliakbar Nazari9; Melesse, Assefa M.10 | |
通讯作者 | Pradhan, Biswajeet |
来源期刊 | JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY
![]() |
ISSN | 0022-1694 |
EISSN | 1879-2707 |
出版年 | 2018 |
卷号 | 565页码:248-261 |
英文摘要 | Sustainable water resources management in arid and semi-arid areas needs robust models, which allow accurate and reliable predictive modeling. This issue has motivated the researchers to develop hybrid models that offer solutions on modelling problems and accurate predictions of groundwater potential zonation. For this purpose, this research aims to investigate the capability and robustness of a novel hybrid model, namely the logistic model tree (LMT) and compares it with state-of-the-art models such as the support vector machine and C4.5 models that locate potential zones for groundwater springs. A spring location dataset consisting of 359 springs was provided by field surveys and national reports and from which three different sample data sets (S1-S3) were randomly prepared (70% for training and 30% for validation). Additionally, 16 spring-related factors were analyzed using regression logistic analysis to find which factors play a significant role in spring occurrence. Twelve significant geo-environmental and morphometric factors were identified and applied in all models. The accuracy of models was evaluated by three different threshold-dependent and -Independent methods including efficiency (E), true skill statistic (TSS), and area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC-ROC) methods. Results showed that the LMT model had the highest accuracy performance for all three validation datasets (E-mean = 0.860, TSSmean = 0.718, AUC-ROCmean = 0.904); although a slight sensitivity to change in input data was sometimes observed for this model. Furthermore, the findings showed that relative slope position (RSP) was the most important factor followed by distance from faults and lithology. |
英文关键词 | Hybrid model Groundwater spring Robustness GIS Logistic model tree |
类型 | Article |
语种 | 英语 |
国家 | Iran ; Norway ; Australia ; South Korea ; USA |
收录类别 | SCI-E |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000447477200020 |
WOS关键词 | SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE ; WEIGHTS-OF-EVIDENCE ; EVIDENTIAL BELIEF FUNCTION ; FUZZY INFERENCE SYSTEM ; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE APPROACH ; LOGISTIC-REGRESSION ; SUSCEPTIBILITY ASSESSMENT ; SPATIAL PREDICTION ; FREQUENCY RATIO ; LEARNING-MODELS |
WOS类目 | Engineering, Civil ; Geosciences, Multidisciplinary ; Water Resources |
WOS研究方向 | Engineering ; Geology ; Water Resources |
资源类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.177/qdio/handle/2XILL650/211087 |
作者单位 | 1.Islamic Azad Univ, Khorramabad Branch, Young Researchers & Elites Club, Khorramabad, Iran; 2.Tarbiat Modares Univ, Dept Watershed Management Engn, Mazandaran, Iran; 3.Univ Kurdistan, Fac Nat Resources, Dept Geomorphol, Sanandaj, Iran; 4.Univ Coll Southeastern Norway, Dept Business & IT, Geog Informat Syst Grp, Gullbringvegen 36, N-3800 Bo I Telemark, Norway; 5.Univ Technol Sydney, Fac Engn & IT, Ctr Adv Modeling & Geospatial Syst CAMGIS, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia; 6.Sejong Univ, Dept Energy & Mineral Resources Engn, 209 Neungdong Ro, Seoul 05006, South Korea; 7.Univ Jiroft, Dept Geog, Kerman, Iran; 8.Univ Jiroft, Fac Nat Resources, Kerman, Iran; 9.Univ Tehran, Fac Nat Resources, Dept Reclamat Arid & Mountainous Reg, Karaj, Iran; 10.Florida Int Univ, Dept Earth & Environm, AHC 5-390, Miami, FL 33199 USA |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Rahmati, Omid,Naghibi, Seyed Amir,Shahabi, Himan,et al. Groundwater spring potential modelling: Comprising the capability and robustness of three different modeling approaches[J],2018,565:248-261. |
APA | Rahmati, Omid.,Naghibi, Seyed Amir.,Shahabi, Himan.,Dieu Tien Bui.,Pradhan, Biswajeet.,...&Melesse, Assefa M..(2018).Groundwater spring potential modelling: Comprising the capability and robustness of three different modeling approaches.JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY,565,248-261. |
MLA | Rahmati, Omid,et al."Groundwater spring potential modelling: Comprising the capability and robustness of three different modeling approaches".JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY 565(2018):248-261. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。