Arid
DOI10.1016/j.gofs.2018.10.028
Definition, epidemiology and risk factors of obstetric anal sphincter injuries: CNGOF Perineal Prevention and Protection in Obstetrics Guidelines
Thubert, T.1,2,3; Cardaillac, C.1,2; Fritel, X.4; Winer, N.1,2; Dochez, V.1,2
通讯作者Thubert, T.
来源期刊GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE FERTILITE & SENOLOGIE
ISSN2468-7189
出版年2018
卷号46期号:12页码:913-921
英文摘要

Objectives. - The aim of this review was to agree on a definition of the obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS), to determine the prevalence and risk factors.


Methods. - A comprehensive review of the literature on the obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS), establishment of levels of evidence (NP), and grades of recommendation according to the methodology of the recommendations for clinical practice.


Results. - To classify obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS), we have used the WHO-RCOG classification, which lists 4 degrees of severity. To designate obstetric anal sphincter injuries, we have used the acronym OASIS, rather than the standard French terms of "complete perineum" and "complicated complete perineum". OASIS with only isolated involvement of the EAS (3a and 3b) appears to have a better functional prognosis than OASIS affecting the IAS or the anorectal mucosa (3c and 4) (LE3). The prevalence of women with ano-rectal symptoms increases with the severity of the OASIS (LE3). In the long term, 35-60% of women who had an OASIS have anal or fecal incontinence (LE3). The prevalence of an OASI in the general population is between 0.25 to 6%. The prevalence of OASIS in primiparous women is between 1.4 and 16% and thus, should be considered more important than among the multiparous women (0.4 to 2.7%). In women with a history of previous OASIS, the risk of occurrence is higher and varies between 5.1 and 10.7% following childbirth. The priority in this context remains the training of childbirth professionals (midwives and obstetricians) to detect these injuries in the delivery room, immediately after the birth. The training and awareness of these practitioners of OASIS diagnosis improves its detection in the delivery room (LE2). Professional experience is associated with better detection of OASIS (LE3) (4). Continuing professional education of obstetrics professionals in the diagnosis and repair of OASIS must be encouraged (Grade C). In the case of second-degree perinea! tear, the use of ultrasound in the delivery room improves the diagnosis of OASIS (LE2). Ultrasound decreases the prevalence of symptoms of severe anal incontinence at 1 year (LE2). The diagnosis of OASIS is improved by the use of endo-anal ultrasonography in post-partum (72 h-6 weeks) (LE2). The principal factors associated with OASIS are nulliparity and instrumental (vaginal operative) delivery; the others are advanced maternal age, history of OASIS, macrosomia, midline episiotomy, posterior cephalic positions, and long labour (LE2). The presence of a perianal lesion (perianal fissure, or anorectal or rectovaginal fistula) is associated with an increased risk of 4th degree lacerations (LE3). Crohn’s disease without perianal involvement is not associated with an excess risk of OASIS (LE3). For women with type III genital mutilation, deinfibulation before delivery is associated with a reduction in the risk of OASIS (LE3); in this situation, deinfibulation is recommended before delivery (grade C).


Conclusion. - It is necessary to use a consensus definition of the OASIS to be able to better detect and treat them. (C) 2018 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.


英文关键词Obstetrical anal sphincter injury Prevalence Risk factor Genital mutilation Crohn’s disease
类型Article
语种French
国家France
收录类别SCI-E
WOS记录号WOS:000455970800020
WOS关键词FEMALE GENITAL MUTILATION ; FECAL INCONTINENCE ; VAGINAL DELIVERY ; CROHNS-DISEASE ; PRIMARY REPAIR ; TEARS ; OUTCOMES ; WOMEN ; 3RD ; RECURRENCE
WOS类目Obstetrics & Gynecology
WOS研究方向Obstetrics & Gynecology
资源类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://119.78.100.177/qdio/handle/2XILL650/209794
作者单位1.CHU Hotel Dieu, Hop Nantes, Serv Gynecol Obstet, 38 Blvd Jean Monnet, F-44000 Nantes, France;
2.Univ Nantes, 1 Rue Gaston Veil, F-44000 Nantes, France;
3.GREEN Grp Rech Clin Neurourol, GMC UPMC 01, 4 Rue Chine, F-75020 Paris, France;
4.CHU Poitiers, Serv Gynecol Obstet, 2 Rue Mil, F-86021 Poitiers, France
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Thubert, T.,Cardaillac, C.,Fritel, X.,et al. Definition, epidemiology and risk factors of obstetric anal sphincter injuries: CNGOF Perineal Prevention and Protection in Obstetrics Guidelines[J],2018,46(12):913-921.
APA Thubert, T.,Cardaillac, C.,Fritel, X.,Winer, N.,&Dochez, V..(2018).Definition, epidemiology and risk factors of obstetric anal sphincter injuries: CNGOF Perineal Prevention and Protection in Obstetrics Guidelines.GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE FERTILITE & SENOLOGIE,46(12),913-921.
MLA Thubert, T.,et al."Definition, epidemiology and risk factors of obstetric anal sphincter injuries: CNGOF Perineal Prevention and Protection in Obstetrics Guidelines".GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE FERTILITE & SENOLOGIE 46.12(2018):913-921.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Thubert, T.]的文章
[Cardaillac, C.]的文章
[Fritel, X.]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Thubert, T.]的文章
[Cardaillac, C.]的文章
[Fritel, X.]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Thubert, T.]的文章
[Cardaillac, C.]的文章
[Fritel, X.]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。