干旱区生态环境知识资源中心

Most animals possess multiple sensory systems, which can be used during navigation. Different senses obtain environmental information on different spatial scales and thus provide a different basis for efficient navigation. Here we used the weakly electric fish Gnathonemus petersii to investigate how different sensory inputs influence the navigational strategy and whether landmark information can be transferred flexibly between two sensory systems. Fish were trained to swim through a maze using a certain route indicated by either visual landmarks, electrical landmarks or without any landmarks. In subsequent tests, egocentric (internal cues, such as motion patterns) and allocentric cues (external cues like landmarks) were put in conflict by relocating the local landmarks. We found that all fish, independent of the available sensory input, chose the egocentric over the allocentric route. However, visual landmarks significantly improved the training duration compared to the other groups, suggesting an involvement of allocentric visual cues during route acquisition. In a second experimental series, fish were trained to use either visual or electrical landmarks for navigation and were subsequently tested in sensory transfer tests. Fish trained with visual landmarks were able to learn this allocentric navigation task and were capable of cross-modal landmark recognition, although navigation based on electrical landmarks was less efficient. The fish trained with electrical landmarks did not learn the task at all, suggesting that the short perceptual range of the electric sense prevented learning of allocentric navigation. Together our results show that the type of sensory input influences the efficiency of allocentric navigation in G. petersii and that these fish can use egocentric and allocentric strategies flexibly to navigate successfully under varying environmental conditions. (C) 2017 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.