Knowledge Resource Center for Ecological Environment in Arid Area
DOI | 10.1007/s11252-015-0477-1 |
Ecosystem services in managing residential landscapes: priorities, value dimensions, and cross-regional patterns | |
Larson, K. L.1; Nelson, K. C.2,3; Samples, S. R.4; Hall, S. J.5; Bettez, N.6; Cavender-Bares, J.7,8; Groffman, P. M.6; Grove, M.7,8; Heffernan, J. B.9; Hobbie, S. E.7,8; Learned, J.5; Morse, J. L.10; Neill, C.11; Ogden, L. A.12; O’Neil-Dunne, J.13; Pataki, D. E.14; Polsky, C.15; Chowdhury, R. Roy16; Steele, M.17; Trammell, T. L. E.14 | |
通讯作者 | Larson, K. L. |
来源期刊 | URBAN ECOSYSTEMS
![]() |
ISSN | 1083-8155 |
EISSN | 1573-1642 |
出版年 | 2016 |
卷号 | 19期号:1页码:95-113 |
英文摘要 | Although ecosystem services have been intensively examined in certain domains (e.g., forests and wetlands), little research has assessed ecosystem services for the most dominant landscape type in urban ecosystems-namely, residential yards. In this paper, we report findings of a cross-site survey of homeowners in six U.S. cities to 1) examine how residents subjectively value various ecosystem services, 2) explore distinctive dimensions of those values, and 3) test the urban homogenization hypothesis. This hypothesis posits that urbanization leads to similarities in the social-ecological dynamics across cities in diverse biomes. By extension, the thesis suggests that residents’ ecosystem service priorities for residential landscapes will be similar regardless of whether residents live in the humid East or the arid West, or the warm South or the cold North. Results underscored that cultural services were of utmost importance, particularly anthropocentric values including aesthetics, low-maintenance, and personal enjoyment. Using factor analyses, distinctive dimensions of residents’ values were found to partially align with the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment’s categories (provisioning, regulating, supporting, and cultural). Finally, residents’ ecosystem service priorities exhibited significant homogenization across regions. In particular, the traditional lawn aesthetic (neat, green, weed-free yards) was similarly important across residents of diverse U.S. cities. Only a few exceptions were found across different environmental and social contexts; for example, cooling effects were more important in the warm South, where residents also valued aesthetics more than those in the North, where low-maintenance yards were a greater priority. |
英文关键词 | Lawns Residential landscapes Land management Human values Ecosystem services Urban sustainability |
类型 | Article |
语种 | 英语 |
国家 | USA |
收录类别 | SCI-E ; SSCI |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000372546000005 |
WOS关键词 | ENVIRONMENTAL ATTITUDES ; URBAN ; MANAGEMENT ; CARE ; HOMOGENIZATION ; CLASSIFICATION ; TRADEOFFS ; PLACE ; COVER ; SENSE |
WOS类目 | Biodiversity Conservation ; Ecology ; Environmental Sciences ; Urban Studies |
WOS研究方向 | Biodiversity & Conservation ; Environmental Sciences & Ecology ; Urban Studies |
来源机构 | Arizona State University ; E18 |
资源类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.177/qdio/handle/2XILL650/196736 |
作者单位 | 1.Arizona State Univ, Sch Geog Sci & Urban Planning, Sch Sustainabil, Mail Code 5302, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA; 2.Univ Minnesota, Dept Forest Resources, 115 Green Hall,1530 Cleveland Ave N, St Paul, MN 55108 USA; 3.Univ Minnesota, Dept Fisheries Wildlife & Conservat Biol, 115 Green Hall,1530 Cleveland Ave N, St Paul, MN 55108 USA; 4.Arizona State Univ, Herberger Inst Design & Arts, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA; 5.Arizona State Univ, Sch Life Sci, 427 E Tyler Mall, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA; 6.Cary Inst Ecosyst Studies, Millbrook, NY 12545 USA; 7.Univ Minnesota, Dept Ecol Evolut & Behav, St Paul, MN 55108 USA; 8.US Forest Serv, No Res Stn, Suite 350,5523 Res Pk Dr, Baltimore, MD 21228 USA; 9.Duke Univ, Nicholas Sch Environm, Box 90328, Durham, NC 27708 USA; 10.Portland State Univ, Dept Environm Sci & Management, POB 751, Portland, OR 97207 USA; 11.Marine Biol Lab, Ctr Ecosyst, 7 MBL St, Woods Hole, MA 02543 USA; 12.Dartmouth Coll, Dept Anthropol, HB 6047 Silsby Hall, Hanover, NH 03755 USA; 13.Rubenstein Sch Environm & Nat Resources, Spatial Anal Lab, 205 George D Aiken Ctr, Burlington, VT 05405 USA; 14.Univ Delaware, Dept Plant & Soil Sci, 531 S Coll Ave,152 Townsend Hall, Newark, DE 19716 USA; 15.Florida Atlantic Univ, Florida Ctr Environm Studies, FL 3200 Coll Ave,Bldg DW Davie, Boca Raton, FL 33314 USA; 16.Indiana Univ, Dept Geog, Student Bldg 120,701 E Kirkwood Ave, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA; 17.Virginia Tech, Dept Crop & Soil Environm Sci, Smyth Hall,185 Ag Quad Ln 330, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Larson, K. L.,Nelson, K. C.,Samples, S. R.,et al. Ecosystem services in managing residential landscapes: priorities, value dimensions, and cross-regional patterns[J]. Arizona State University, E18,2016,19(1):95-113. |
APA | Larson, K. L..,Nelson, K. C..,Samples, S. R..,Hall, S. J..,Bettez, N..,...&Trammell, T. L. E..(2016).Ecosystem services in managing residential landscapes: priorities, value dimensions, and cross-regional patterns.URBAN ECOSYSTEMS,19(1),95-113. |
MLA | Larson, K. L.,et al."Ecosystem services in managing residential landscapes: priorities, value dimensions, and cross-regional patterns".URBAN ECOSYSTEMS 19.1(2016):95-113. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。