Knowledge Resource Center for Ecological Environment in Arid Area
DOI | 10.1007/s10841-016-9844-3 |
Effects of two locust control methods on wood-eating termites in arid Australia | |
Maute, Kimberly1; French, Kristine1; Story, Paul2; Bull, C. M.3; Hose, Grant C.4 | |
通讯作者 | Maute, Kimberly |
来源期刊 | JOURNAL OF INSECT CONSERVATION
![]() |
ISSN | 1366-638X |
EISSN | 1572-9753 |
出版年 | 2016 |
卷号 | 20期号:1页码:107-118 |
英文摘要 | Termites are ubiquitous detritivores and are a key influence on soil function and nutrient cycles, particularly in arid and semi-arid ecosystems. Locust control presents a unique hazard to termites and the effective functioning of ecosystems as a consequence of the overlap between pesticide applications and termite populations in grassland and desert landscapes. We monitored the effects of locust control methods using ultra-low-volume (ULV) barrier application of a chemical pesticide, fipronil, and a blanket application of a fungal biopesticide, Metarhizium acridum, on wood-eating termites in arid western New South Wales, Australia. We tested the hypothesis that spray applications decrease termite activity at wood baits using a BACI designed field experiment over 2 years. Our replicated control and treatment sites represented the spatial scale of Australian locust control activities. There was no detectable impact of either locust control treatment on termite activity, bait mass loss or termite community composition measures. Non-significant differences in termite survey measures among sites suggested that climate and environmental conditions were stronger drivers of our termite measures than the single, localized and unreplicated application of pesticides more commonly used in locust control operations in arid Australia. A lack of evidence for an impact of our fipronil or Metarhizium application methods supports their use as low hazard locust control options with minimal large scale and longer-term effects on termites in Australian arid rangelands. Future research would be necessary to determine the probable short-term impacts of treatments on individual termite colonies and the possible impacts on non-wood eating termite species in the arid-zone. |
英文关键词 | Metarhizium Fipronil Bait Pesticide Non-target BACI |
类型 | Article |
语种 | 英语 |
国家 | Australia |
收录类别 | SCI-E |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000371086000010 |
WOS关键词 | SUBTERRANEAN TERMITE ; ISOPTERA RHINOTERMITIDAE ; BIOLOGICAL-CONTROL ; WHEAT-BELT ; COMMUNITIES ; IMPACT ; METARHIZIUM ; DESERT ; ARTHROPODS ; VEGETATION |
WOS类目 | Biodiversity Conservation ; Entomology |
WOS研究方向 | Biodiversity & Conservation ; Entomology |
资源类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.177/qdio/handle/2XILL650/194563 |
作者单位 | 1.Univ Wollongong, Sch Biol Sci, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia; 2.Australian Plague Locust Commiss, GPO Box 858, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia; 3.Flinders Univ S Australia, Sch Biol Sci, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia; 4.Macquarie Univ, Dept Biol Sci, Fac Sci, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Maute, Kimberly,French, Kristine,Story, Paul,et al. Effects of two locust control methods on wood-eating termites in arid Australia[J],2016,20(1):107-118. |
APA | Maute, Kimberly,French, Kristine,Story, Paul,Bull, C. M.,&Hose, Grant C..(2016).Effects of two locust control methods on wood-eating termites in arid Australia.JOURNAL OF INSECT CONSERVATION,20(1),107-118. |
MLA | Maute, Kimberly,et al."Effects of two locust control methods on wood-eating termites in arid Australia".JOURNAL OF INSECT CONSERVATION 20.1(2016):107-118. |
条目包含的文件 | ||||||
文件名称/大小 | 资源类型 | 版本类型 | 开放类型 | 使用许可 | ||
Effects of two locus(766KB) | 期刊论文 | 出版稿 | 开放获取 | CC BY-NC-SA | 浏览 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。