Knowledge Resource Center for Ecological Environment in Arid Area
DOI | 10.1002/esp.3892 |
Does litter decomposition vary between the foraging pits of two soil-disturbing mammal species? | |
Travers, Samantha K.; Eldridge, David J. | |
通讯作者 | Travers, Samantha K. |
来源期刊 | EARTH SURFACE PROCESSES AND LANDFORMS
![]() |
ISSN | 0197-9337 |
EISSN | 1096-9837 |
出版年 | 2016 |
卷号 | 41期号:5页码:669-676 |
英文摘要 | Soil-disturbing animals play a critical role in many ecosystem processes. The loss of native soil-foraging mammals (e.g. greater bilby Macrotis lagotis; burrowing bettong, Bettongia lesueur) throughout vast areas of Australia has altered fundamental soil processes such as decomposition. Little is known about whether surviving native soil-disturbing animals (e.g. short-beaked echidna, Tachyglossus aculeatus) produce soil disturbances that are functionally equivalent to those of locally-extinct native animals. We used a litter bag study to compare abiotic and biotic mechanisms of decomposition within the foraging pits of two native mammal species. We compared decomposition rates between landforms, which we used as a surrogate for soil texture; grass species Austrostipa scabra subsp. scabra and Triodia scariosa subsp. scariosa, which we used as our substrates; and the effects of chemically excluding fungi and/or termites. There were initial differences in the organic mass loss between echidna and bilby/bettong foraging pits, with bilby/bettong pits losing more over 30days, and echidnas losing more over 63days. However, over 396days there was no significant difference between the two pit types. Landform (soil texture) and chemical exclusion of termites and fungi did not affect our measures of decomposition until the final stage of the study. The two grass species lost significantly different amounts of organic material at each collection interval, with Austrostipa losing more at 30, 63 and 130days and Triodia losing more at the final 396day collection. This provided the most consistent effect on decomposition. Our results highlight the temporal idiosyncrasies in the various drivers of decomposition in this dune-swale system. Overall, this study provides evidence that the foraging pits of the short-beaked echidna do not differ markedly from those of the locally extinct greater bilby and burrowing bettong in terms of their capacity to maintain rates of decomposition at an annual scale. Copyright (c) 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
英文关键词 | arid ecosystem engineer decomposition ecosystem function mallee woodland |
类型 | Article |
语种 | 英语 |
国家 | Australia |
收录类别 | SCI-E |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000373998500008 |
WOS关键词 | NORTHERN CHIHUAHUAN DESERT ; SUBTERRANEAN TERMITES ; EASTERN AUSTRALIA ; ECOSYSTEMS ; BIOTA ; PHOTODEGRADATION ; WORLDWIDE ; GRADIENT ; RAINFALL ; GRASSES |
WOS类目 | Geography, Physical ; Geosciences, Multidisciplinary |
WOS研究方向 | Physical Geography ; Geology |
资源类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.177/qdio/handle/2XILL650/192308 |
作者单位 | Univ New S Wales, Sch Biol Earth & Environm Sci, Ctr Ecosyst Sci, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Travers, Samantha K.,Eldridge, David J.. Does litter decomposition vary between the foraging pits of two soil-disturbing mammal species?[J],2016,41(5):669-676. |
APA | Travers, Samantha K.,&Eldridge, David J..(2016).Does litter decomposition vary between the foraging pits of two soil-disturbing mammal species?.EARTH SURFACE PROCESSES AND LANDFORMS,41(5),669-676. |
MLA | Travers, Samantha K.,et al."Does litter decomposition vary between the foraging pits of two soil-disturbing mammal species?".EARTH SURFACE PROCESSES AND LANDFORMS 41.5(2016):669-676. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。