干旱区生态环境知识资源中心

Regional evapotranspiration (ET) estimation is crucial for regional water resources management and allocation. This paper evaluated the performance of three contextual remote sensing based models for ET estimation (METRIC Mapping Evapotranspiration at High Resolution with Internalized Calibration; the T-s-VI triangle model; and SSEB-Simplified Surface Energy Balance) in an oasis-desert region during a growing season under advective environmental conditions. The performance of the three models was first assessed using surface fluxes observed at five eddy covariance (EC) flux towers installed in different land-cover types. Comparisons among model outputs were then conducted on a pixel-by-pixel basis for three main land-cover types (farmland, transition zone and desert). For METRIC and SSEB, good correlations were obtained between the modeled versus measured instantaneous latent heat flux (lambda ET), with both R-2 values above 0.90. Outliers occurred when available energy was overestimated for the T-s-VI triangle model. Pixel-wise comparisons showed the greatest consistency between the T-s-VI triangle model and METRIC outputs in farmland with an R-2 of 0.98 and an RMSE of 13.69 W m(-2). Overall, METRIC outperformed both the T-s-VI triangle and SSEB models; the T-s-VI triangle model tended to overestimate and the SSEB to underestimate at higher values of lambda ET. ET estimations by SSEB and the T-s-VI triangle model are more sensitive to the estimated surface temperature and available energy than those from METRIC. Two daily ET extrapolation methods were evaluated with the EC measured daily ET. The results indicated that the constant reference ET fraction (ETrF) method could be used over well-watered areas due to the regional advection effect; the constant evaporative fraction (EF) method tended to give better outputs for other areas. Reasonable estimates of ET can be achieved by carefully selecting extreme pixels or edges, and validation is required when applying remote sensing based models, especially the contextual methods. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.