Knowledge Resource Center for Ecological Environment in Arid Area
DOI | 10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.05.019 |
A wildfire event influences ecosystem carbon fluxes but not soil respiration in a semi-arid woodland | |
Sun, Qiaoqi1; Meyer, Wayne S.1; Koerber, Georgia R.1; Marschner, Petra2 | |
通讯作者 | Sun, Qiaoqi |
来源期刊 | AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY
![]() |
ISSN | 0168-1923 |
EISSN | 1873-2240 |
出版年 | 2016 |
卷号 | 226页码:57-66 |
英文摘要 | The importance of arid and semi-arid ecosystems for global net carbon uptake has recently been highlighted. More information about the drivers of carbon fluxes in these ecosystems is required to advance our understanding of the contribution of dry ecosystems to the global carbon budget. In this study, eddy covariance flux data was used to calculate net ecosystem productivity (NEP), gross primary productivity (GPP) and ecosystem respiration (Reco) in a semi-arid woodland on sandy soil. In January 2014 a wildfire severely damaged the area around the flux tower, burning trees and spinifex and consuming above-ground bark and leaf litter. The flux tower recorded data for one year before the fire (January-December 2013) and more than one year after the fire (May 2014-July 2015). Soil respiration was measured in-situ monthly after the fire (July 2014-June 2015), in burnt and unburnt areas under Eucalyptus tree canopy and inter-canopy representing 25 and 75% of the area, respectively. Before the fire the ecosystem was a net carbon sink, sequestering 81 g C m(-2) yr(-1) in 2013, but became a carbon source after the fire. Reco and GPP declined by about 35% and 65%, respectively, after the fire. Net carbon uptake resumed 12-15 months after the fire with NEP approaching values similar to those before the fire. Soil respiration was significantly higher under tree canopies (1.5 mu mol CO2 m(-2) s(-1)) than in inter-canopy areas (0.9 mu mol CO2 m(-2) s(-1)). Soil respiration was mainly driven by soil water content and thus magnitude and distribution of precipitation, but was not influenced by the wildfire. Accounting for differences in area, soil respiration from inter-canopy and under canopy contributed 51 and 32% to total ecosystem respiration. It can be concluded that carbon flux in this semi-arid woodland was strongly influenced by precipitation and wildfire, with net carbon uptake of the ecosystem beginning approximately one year after the fire. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. |
英文关键词 | Ecosystem carbon flux Eddy covariance Precipitation Semi-arid woodland Soil respiration Wildfire |
类型 | Article |
语种 | 英语 |
国家 | Australia |
收录类别 | SCI-E |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000380598200006 |
WOS关键词 | NET ECOSYSTEM ; INTERANNUAL VARIABILITY ; TERRESTRIAL ECOSYSTEMS ; PONDEROSA PINE ; CLIMATE-CHANGE ; WATER FLUXES ; CO2 EFFLUX ; DYNAMICS ; VEGETATION ; AUSTRALIA |
WOS类目 | Agronomy ; Forestry ; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences |
WOS研究方向 | Agriculture ; Forestry ; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences |
资源类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.177/qdio/handle/2XILL650/191067 |
作者单位 | 1.Univ Adelaide, Sch Biol Sci, Dept Ecol & Environm Sci, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia; 2.Univ Adelaide, Sch Agr Food & Wine, Soils, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Sun, Qiaoqi,Meyer, Wayne S.,Koerber, Georgia R.,et al. A wildfire event influences ecosystem carbon fluxes but not soil respiration in a semi-arid woodland[J],2016,226:57-66. |
APA | Sun, Qiaoqi,Meyer, Wayne S.,Koerber, Georgia R.,&Marschner, Petra.(2016).A wildfire event influences ecosystem carbon fluxes but not soil respiration in a semi-arid woodland.AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY,226,57-66. |
MLA | Sun, Qiaoqi,et al."A wildfire event influences ecosystem carbon fluxes but not soil respiration in a semi-arid woodland".AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY 226(2016):57-66. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。